On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:24 AM Micah Kornfield wrote:
>
> >
> > Re now vs Feb 17: I'm totally open to either. In general, I'm a do it now
> > kind of person so if others think a slightly longer tenure sounds good, we
> > could do it now.
>
> This makes sense to me as well, we can align on Feb 17
>
> Re now vs Feb 17: I'm totally open to either. In general, I'm a do it now
> kind of person so if others think a slightly longer tenure sounds good, we
> could do it now.
This makes sense to me as well, we can align on Feb 17th the next time
around.
Per my comments elsewhere, I'd like to nomin
I'm super supportive of this, Julian. Thanks for bringing it up.
Unlike some leaders, I'm even happy to guarantee a peaceful transition of
power!
Re now vs Feb 17: I'm totally open to either. In general, I'm a do it now
kind of person so if others think a slightly longer tenure sounds good, we
co
Feb 17 as a term end date sounds good.
We don’t necessarily have to wait until Feb 17. If we want to move on this
sooner, the next Chair could serve a slightly longer term, ending on Feb 17
2022.
> On Sep 29, 2020, at 11:25 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> This sounds reasonable to me. We are appr
This sounds reasonable to me. We are approaching our 5 year
anniversary as an Apache project (on February 17, 2021) and I have
thought that it would make sense to rotate PMC chairs at some point,
but making it an annual thing makes things even simpler.
For what it's worth, in this project the PMC
There has been some discussion in the Arrow PMC about rotating the PMC
Chair (also known as the project VP) every year. I wanted to raise the
topic here for discussion among Arrow committers and within the
broader Arrow community.
Quite a few Apache projects have adopted a policy where they choose
