Re: [DISCUSS] Moving forward on the Arrow-Parquet C++ monorepo project

2018-08-19 Thread Julian Hyde
The votes to grant commit access that you refer to are votes to appoint committers or PMC members. Those votes are conducted in private to prevent embarrassment in case the vote fails, or if the vote passes and the individual declines the offer. I don’t see any such potential embarrassment here

Re: [DISCUSS] Moving forward on the Arrow-Parquet C++ monorepo project

2018-08-19 Thread Uwe L. Korn
Hello Wes, I think we should have a vote on this. I expect that, as previously mentioned in this debate, there is a large overlap between the two projects as it's on the C++ side basically the same community but as it is an issue concerning both projects, the vote shall also be done in the two

[DISCUSS] Moving forward on the Arrow-Parquet C++ monorepo project

2018-08-16 Thread Wes McKinney
hi folks, I have just started a vote on the Parquet dev@ mailing list about merging development process of the Parquet C++ codebase + Arrow integration to a single repository, i.e. the Arrow one: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/53f77f9f1f04b97709a0286db1b73a49b7f1541d8f8b2cb32db5c922@%3Cdev.