Congratulations Adam
On Tue, 19 Nov 2024 at 10:28 AM, Weston Pace wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, 7:13 PM Jacob Wujciak wrote:
>
> > Congratulations and welcome Adam!
> >
> > Am Di., 19. Nov. 2024 um 03:31 Uhr schrieb wish maple <
> > maplewish...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > Con
Congratulations!
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, 7:13 PM Jacob Wujciak wrote:
> Congratulations and welcome Adam!
>
> Am Di., 19. Nov. 2024 um 03:31 Uhr schrieb wish maple <
> maplewish...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > Congrets Adam!
> >
> > Best,
> > Xuwei Fu
> >
> > Sutou Kouhei 于2024年11月19日周二 08:31写道：
> >
> > >
Thanks Kou and Jacob—great points.
+1 from me.
Ian
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 10:01 PM Jacob Wujciak
wrote:
> +1
>
> Neal makes a great point
> >it makes sense that they should have a release process and cadence that
> matches, and that those that are under active development should be able to
>
+1.
And a big +1 on Jacob:
> I think now is probably the point where we should look at centralizing
some of these scripts/tools instead of continuing to copy-paste them into
more repos (same for some of the workflows, we can make those re-usable
actions).
For example when verifying release candid
Congratulations and welcome Adam!
Am Di., 19. Nov. 2024 um 03:31 Uhr schrieb wish maple :
>
> Congrets Adam!
>
> Best,
> Xuwei Fu
>
> Sutou Kouhei 于2024年11月19日周二 08:31写道：
>
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
> > has accepted an invitation to become a committer o
+1
Neal makes a great point
>it makes sense that they should have a release process and cadence that
>matches, and that those that are under active development should be able to
>move ahead more freely.
This also gives a more honest view into the implementation's
development velocity, which in
Congrets Adam!
Best,
Xuwei Fu
Sutou Kouhei 于2024年11月19日周二 08:31写道：
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
> has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> kou
>
>
Congratulations Adam!
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:47 PM Ian Cook wrote:
> Congratulations Adam!
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 19:31 Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
> > has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> > Arrow. W
Hi,
It's a good point. I'm not sure whether it will happen or
not. But, in my experience, watchability is improved by
splitting to a new repository.
In apache/arrow, we use the "[Java]" tag in issues and PRs
such as "[Java][FlightRPC] Java arrow flight server stuck in
reader.getDescriptor()". But
Welcome & congrats Adam!
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024, at 10:21, Ruoxi Sun wrote:
> Congratulations Adam!
>
> *Regards,*
> *Rossi SUN*
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:20 AM Gang Wu wrote:
>
>> Congrats Adam!
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:11 AM Curt Hagenlocher
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Congratulations Adam!
>
On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
--
kou
Hi Raúl,
> I am also happy to help with the releases on the Java repository and,
> as with Go, I am also happy to help with some of the migration tasks.
Thanks!
> As a side note, in general I tend to have more problems with
> JavaScript when releasing, verifying, etcetera. I would love for
> Jav
Hi Gang,
> I can volunteer to be a release
> manager
> on the Java side if I can help. I have some experience in releasing orc and
> parquet-java in the past.
Thanks! It's very helpful! I can help a release manager on
the Java side. So it will work well.
Congratulations Adam!
*Regards,*
*Rossi SUN*
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:20 AM Gang Wu wrote:
> Congrats Adam!
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:11 AM Curt Hagenlocher
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Adam!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:47 PM Ian Cook wrote:
> >
> > > Congratulations Adam!
> > >
Congrats Adam!
On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 9:11 AM Curt Hagenlocher
wrote:
> Congratulations Adam!
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 4:47 PM Ian Cook wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Adam!
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 19:31 Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> >
> > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce t
+1
Verified on M1 Mac.
Thanks Andrew.
Wayne Xia 于2024年11月18日周一 16:41写道：
> +1
>
> Verified on AMD64 ArchLinux
>
> Thanks Andrew
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:37 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Verified on M3 Mac.
> >
> > Thanks Andrew.
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 4:01 AM A
Congratulations Adam!
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 19:31 Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Adam Reeve
> has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your contributions!
>
> --
> kou
>
>
+1 (non-binding)
I successfully verified by running:
TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
TEST_CPP=1 \
./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 18.1.0 2
on macOS 15.1 (aarch64). I couldn't verify Python because I was
getting consistent crashes in the Flight tests [1].
[1] https://gist.github.com/amoeba/6eb6
There was some informal discussion about this in the biweekly Arrow
community meeting on November 6. One concern raised was that
implementations outside the monorepo could suffer from an "out of sight,
out of mind" problem. For example, because the new apache/arrow-java repo
will have many fewer co
+1
Verified on AMD64 ArchLinux
Thanks Andrew
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 2:37 AM L. C. Hsieh wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified on M3 Mac.
>
> Thanks Andrew.
>
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 4:01 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implement
Hi Kou,
Thanks a lot for bringing this.
I'm +1 on the principle, both for splitting the Java release process and
moving the Java implementation into another repository.
We do need to find more maintainers for Arrow Java, but that is true
regardless of whether the Java implementation stays
+1, makes sense to me. Since many of the Arrow libraries are at a more
stable phase of development, it makes sense that they should have a release
process and cadence that matches, and that those that are under active
development should be able to move ahead more freely.
Neal
On Mon, Nov 18, 202
+1 on splitting the Java codebase!
I'm not an active contributor/reviewer to the Java codebase, though I have
several contributions to it in the past. I can volunteer to be a release
manager
on the Java side if I can help. I have some experience in releasing orc and
parquet-java in the past.
Best
+1 (binding)
I've tested successfully sources and binaries:
- TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1
./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 18.1.0 2
- TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_BINARY=1
./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 18.1.0 2
- TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_APT=1 ./dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh 18.
+1 (non-binding)
Ran TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_CPP=1 ./verify-release-candidate.sh 18.1.0 2 on my
Mac M1.
```
100% tests passed, 0 tests failed out of 96
Label Time Summary:
arrow-compute-tests= 35.99 sec*proc (13 tests)
arrow-tests= 155.56 sec*proc (39 tests)
arrow_acero=
I am also +1 on moving the Java implementation to its own repository.
I am also happy to help with the releases on the Java repository and,
as with Go, I am also happy to help with some of the migration tasks.
As a side note, in general I tend to have more problems with
JavaScript when releasing,
Hi Susmit,
You can pass headers: see the documentation [1].
[1]:
https://arrow.apache.org/adbc/current/python/api/adbc_driver_flightsql.html#adbc_driver_flightsql.ConnectionOptions.RPC_CALL_HEADER_PREFIX
-David
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024, at 16:16, Susmit Sarkar wrote:
> Hi Community Members,
>
> We
While early, it seems to have gone well for Go. The ability to do more frequent
point releases for Java might be interesting.
Since the JNI JARs bundle the C++ libraries when built, we can build off of the
latest released C++ version whenever the Java project needs to release, and not
have to w
28 matches
Mail list logo
