The vote passes with 4 binding +1 votes, no other votes.
Binding votes:
- Matt Topol
- Raúl Cumplido
- Sutou Kouhei
- David Li
I will begin on the release tasks next.
On Thu, Sep 5, 2024, at 03:41, Matt Topol wrote:
> My vote: +1 (binding)
>
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:42 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
@Micah, I mostly started the vote now because I've spent the last week and
a half in C++ template hell + playing wack-a-mole with unit tests and
wanted to have something to show for it while I put the finishing cleanup
on the Go implementation. The other reason is pretty much for the reason
that Fe
+1 (non-binding)
Micah Kornfield, you have a good point. One spec without at least 2
implementations is not a serious spec.
But I think we can run the vote now and defer the merging of the
implementations until we are confident both implementations are almost
complete, tested and the spec text co
+1 (non-binding)
I can upload a PR for the corresponding C# change within the next day.
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024 at 2:21 PM Matt Topol wrote:
> Based on various discussions among the ecosystem and to continue expanding
> the zero-copy interoperability for Arrow to be used with different
> libraries
Based on various discussions among the ecosystem and to continue expanding
the zero-copy interoperability for Arrow to be used with different
libraries and databases (such as libcudf, ClickHouse, etc) I would like to
propose that we extend the allowable bit-widths for Arrow Decimal types to
allow 3
