Re: [DISCUSS] Statistics through the C data interface

2024-07-24 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, If nobody objects using utf8 or dictionary for statistics key, let's use dictionary. Because dictionary will be more effective than utf8 when there are many columns. I'll start writing a documentation for this and implementing this for C++ next week. I'll share a PR for them when I complete t

Re: [DISCUSS][C++] How about adding arrow::ArrayStatistics?

2024-07-24 Thread Sutou Kouhei
Hi, I've updated the arrow::ArrayStatistics implementation: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/43273 It's a separated PR of the previous PR: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/42133 The new PR doesn't include Apache Parquet integration. It just adds arrow::ArrayStatistics. We'll add Apache P

Re: [VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 52.2.0 RC1

2024-07-24 Thread L. C. Hsieh
+1 (binding) Verified on M3 Mac. Thanks Andrew. On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 4:31 PM Andrew Lamb wrote: > > Hi, > > I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, > version 52.2.0. > > This release candidate is based on commit: > 49e714de6e951169d0d5e73381af247ad0230fcf [1] >

[VOTE][RUST] Release Apache Arrow Rust 52.2.0 RC1

2024-07-24 Thread Andrew Lamb
Hi, I would like to propose a release of Apache Arrow Rust Implementation, version 52.2.0. This release candidate is based on commit: 49e714de6e951169d0d5e73381af247ad0230fcf [1] The proposed release tarball and signatures are hosted at [2]. The changelog is located at [3]. Please download, ve

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Micah Kornfield
+1 (binding) On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 2:19 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote: > +1 (binding) > > In <8ce8b9a4-ae7a-41eb-ab6e-a5ceb2258...@app.fastmail.com> > "[VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type" on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 > 14:33:01 +0900, > "David Li" wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like to propos

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Sutou Kouhei
+1 (binding) In <8ce8b9a4-ae7a-41eb-ab6e-a5ceb2258...@app.fastmail.com> "[VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type" on Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:33:01 +0900, "David Li" wrote: > Hello, > > I'd like to propose the 'Opaque' canonical extension type. Prior discussion > can be found at [1] and

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question about arrow flight authentication

2024-07-24 Thread Zhao, Chuan
Hi David, Have you had a chance to review the files I have uploaded? Thanks. -Chuan From: Zhao, Chuan Date: Tuesday, July 23, 2024 at 7:44 PM To: lidav...@apache.org Cc: dev@arrow.apache.org Subject: Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: Question about arrow flight authentication [You don't often get email from

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Weston Pace
+1 (binding) On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 8:01 AM Dane Pitkin wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I reviewed the spec and Java implementation. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:37 AM Ian Cook wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > I reviewed the spec additions. > > > > Ian > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:2

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Dane Pitkin
+1 (non-binding) I reviewed the spec and Java implementation. On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:37 AM Ian Cook wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > I reviewed the spec additions. > > Ian > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:27 AM Jacob Wujciak-Jens > wrote: > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > wish maple schrieb am Mi

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Matt Topol
+1 (binding) Thanks! On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:27 AM Jacob Wujciak-Jens wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > wish maple schrieb am Mi., 24. Juli 2024, 15:12: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > > > Best, > > Xuwei Fu > > > > Gang Wu 于2024年7月24日周三 20:51写道: > > > > >

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Ian Cook
+1 (non-binding) I reviewed the spec additions. Ian On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:27 AM Jacob Wujciak-Jens wrote: > +1 (non binding) > > wish maple schrieb am Mi., 24. Juli 2024, 15:12: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > > > Best, > > Xuwei Fu > > > > Gang Wu 于

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Jacob Wujciak-Jens
+1 (non binding) wish maple schrieb am Mi., 24. Juli 2024, 15:12: > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > Best, > Xuwei Fu > > Gang Wu 于2024年7月24日周三 20:51写道: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:52 PM Joel Lubini

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Dewey Dunnington
+1 (binding)! (Thanks!) On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 10:10 AM wish maple wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > Best, > Xuwei Fu > > Gang Wu 于2024年7月24日周三 20:51写道: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:52 PM J

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread wish maple
+1 (non-binding) Checked spec change and C++ impl. Best, Xuwei Fu Gang Wu 于2024年7月24日周三 20:51写道: > +1 (non-binding) > > Checked spec change and C++ impl. > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:52 PM Joel Lubinitsky > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Go implementation LGTM > > > > On Wed, Jul 24,

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Gang Wu
+1 (non-binding) Checked spec change and C++ impl. On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 6:52 PM Joel Lubinitsky wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Go implementation LGTM > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:12 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Format change looks good to me. I haven't reviewed the ind

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Joel Lubinitsky
+1 (non-binding) Go implementation LGTM On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:12 AM Raúl Cumplido wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Format change looks good to me. I haven't reviewed the individual > implementations. > > Thanks David for leading this. > > El mié, 24 jul 2024 a las 10:51, Joris Van den Bossche > ()

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Raúl Cumplido
+1 (binding) Format change looks good to me. I haven't reviewed the individual implementations. Thanks David for leading this. El mié, 24 jul 2024 a las 10:51, Joris Van den Bossche () escribió: > > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 07:34, David Li wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I'd like t

Re: [VOTE][Format] Opaque canonical extension type

2024-07-24 Thread Joris Van den Bossche
+1 (binding) On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 07:34, David Li wrote: > > Hello, > > I'd like to propose the 'Opaque' canonical extension type. Prior discussion > can be found at [1] and the proposal and implementations for C++, Go, Java, > and Python can be found at [2]. The proposal is additionally repr