+1 (non-binding)

Go implementation LGTM

On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 5:12 AM Raúl Cumplido <rau...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Format change looks good to me. I haven't reviewed the individual
> implementations.
>
> Thanks David for leading this.
>
> El mié, 24 jul 2024 a las 10:51, Joris Van den Bossche
> (<jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 at 07:34, David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I'd like to propose the 'Opaque' canonical extension type. Prior
> discussion can be found at [1] and the proposal and implementations for
> C++, Go, Java, and Python can be found at [2]. The proposal is additionally
> reproduced below.
> > >
> > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept this proposal
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do not accept this proposal because...
> > >
> > > [1]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/8d5ldl5cb7mms21rd15lhpfrv4j9no4n
> > > [2]: https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/41823
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Opaque represents a type that an Arrow-based system received from an
> external
> > > (often non-Arrow) system, but that it cannot interpret.  In this case,
> it can
> > > pass on Opaque to its clients to at least show that a field exists and
> > > preserve metadata about the type from the other system.
> > >
> > > Extension parameters:
> > >
> > > * Extension name: ``arrow.opaque``.
> > >
> > > * The storage type of this extension is any type.  If there is no
> underlying
> > >   data, the storage type should be Null.
> > >
> > > * Extension type parameters:
> > >
> > >   * **type_name** = the name of the unknown type in the external
> system.
> > >   * **vendor_name** = the name of the external system.
> > >
> > > * Description of the serialization:
> > >
> > >   A valid JSON object containing the parameters as fields.  In the
> future,
> > >   additional fields may be added, but all fields current and future
> are never
> > >   required to interpret the array.
> > >
> > >   Developers **should not** attempt to enable public semantic
> interoperability
> > >   of Opaque by canonicalizing specific values of these parameters.
>

Reply via email to