+1
In <2a98c33e-60c1-4df9-80db-350939eb8...@app.fastmail.com>
"[VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0" on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:39:46 -0400,
"David Li" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly
> decided to treat as a specification [2]. These
Hi,
The vote carries with 3 +1 binding votes, no non-binding
vote and no -1 votes.
I'll merge https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/36946 .
Thanks,
--
kou
In <20230811.105721.969618469307878987@clear-code.com>
"[VOTE][Format][Flight] Long-running queries support" on Fri, 11 Aug 2023
10:5
The vote passes with 8 +1 votes (5 binding).
I published the source release, but unfortunately, I could not publish the
crates to crates.io due to a circular dependency. I have filed an issue for
this:
https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/issues/7281
I don't think I can unpublish the sourc
+1
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 1:58 PM Will Jones wrote:
> +1
>
> These additions look excellent.
>
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Li wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly
> > decided to treat as a specification [2]. These re
+1
These additions look excellent.
On Mon, Aug 14, 2023 at 10:40 AM David Li wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly
> decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various
> missing features (e.g. cancellation, error met
Hello,
We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly
decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various
missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position ADBC
to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing
+1 (binding)
Tested on M1 Mac
On first try I got this failing test (increased open file limit to pass)
failures:
fuzz_cases::order_spill_fuzz::test_sort_1k_mem stdout
thread 'fuzz_cases::order_spill_fuzz::test_sort_1k_mem' panicked at 'called
`Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: Exe
