+1

In <2a98c33e-60c1-4df9-80db-350939eb8...@app.fastmail.com>
  "[VOTE] Apache Arrow ADBC (API) 1.1.0" on Mon, 14 Aug 2023 13:39:46 -0400,
  "David Li" <lidav...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> We have been discussing revisions [1] to the ADBC APIs, which we formerly 
> decided to treat as a specification [2]. These revisions clean up various 
> missing features (e.g. cancellation, error metadata) and better position ADBC 
> to help different data systems interoperate (e.g. by exposing more metadata, 
> like table/column statistics).
> 
> For details, see the PR at [3]. (The main file to read through is adbc.h.)
> 
> I would like to propose that the Arrow project adopt this RFC, along with the 
> linked PR, as version 1.1.0 of the ADBC API standard.
> 
> Please vote to adopt the specification as described above. This is not a vote 
> to release any packages; the first package release to support version 1.1.0 
> of the APIs will be 0.7.0 of the packages. (So I will not merge the linked PR 
> until after we release ADBC 0.6.0.)
> 
> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> 
> [ ] +1 Adopt the ADBC 1.1.0 specification
> [ ]  0
> [ ] -1 Do not adopt the specification because...
> 
> Thanks to Sutou Kouhei, Matt Topol, Dewey Dunnington, Antoine Pitrou, Will 
> Ayd, and Will Jones for feedback on the design and various work-in-progress 
> PRs.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/milestone/3
> [2]: https://lists.apache.org/thread/s8m4l9hccfh5kqvvd2x3gxn3ry0w1ryo
> [3]: https://github.com/apache/arrow-adbc/pull/971
> 
> Thank you,
> David

Reply via email to