Hello guys, sorry I have to to request for review here again since
progress didn't seem to be made yet :(. These PRs are important to
Dataset Java implementation as the first version of it was too basic to
serve advanced use cases. If reviewing of the big write support PR[1]
sounds to be a bit of c
In the interest of avoiding bit-rot I'm OK with checking in the PR once its
been reviewed, but we probably shouldn't do an official release of it (I'm
not sure if this is feasible with our current release scripts).
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 2:46 PM David Li wrote:
> Sorry, you're right - I got the
Sorry, you're right - I got the process mixed up. Having two implementations
ready before a vote was discussed a few years back [1] so we should have the
C++ implementation ready first. Apologies for the confusion.
In the meantime, I'll give the Java implementation a more thorough review when
I
Hi Shuai,
I responded on the JIRA (and have a PR out to fix the issue I think).
-Micah
On Fri, Aug 20, 2021 at 5:39 AM 张帅 wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm suffering from a coredump issue when writing Arrow table to Parquet
> file. This issue is stable reproducible when compiling Arrow without
>
>
> > To Micah's question, yes, we're going to hold a vote and treat it as
> part of the spec, though even then like Flight itself it will be
> "experimental" for a time.
I'm not quite clear on what we would be voting on without the second
implementation being present (even if it remains pre-1.0.
There is now a design doc [1] available for comment
[1]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZEZqvdohrot0ewtTNeaBtqczOIJ1Q0OnX9PqMMxpOF8/edit#
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 2:34 PM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> I wanted to draw attention to a PR[1] in the DataFusion repository that
> proposes a API designed
