> > > To Micah's question, yes, we're going to hold a vote and treat it as > part of the spec, though even then like Flight itself it will be > "experimental" for a time.
I'm not quite clear on what we would be voting on without the second implementation being present (even if it remains pre-1.0.0 after the initial version. I suspect we might want a different version number for Flight SQL?) -Micah On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:40 PM David Li <lidav...@apache.org> wrote: > To Micah's question, yes, we're going to hold a vote and treat it as part > of the spec, though even then like Flight itself it will be "experimental" > for a time. > > I think given the progress here, at least if there's no major comments > about the Protobuf spec itself, we should be holding a vote in the near > future. > > -David > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021, at 13:40, Kyle Porter wrote: > > I believe that is the expectation, however not being fluent in the full > > workings I defer to those who know better. > > > > I can say that the C++ implementation will be something we will be > working > > on in the immediate future. > > > > *Kyle Porter* > > CEO > > Bit Quill Technologies Inc. > > Office: +1.778.331.3355 | Direct: +1.604.441.7318 | > ky...@bitquilltech.com > > https://www.bitquill.com > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and > may > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > review, > > use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy > > all copies of the original message. Thank you. > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 10:26 AM Micah Kornfield <emkornfi...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > I just wanted to confirm that the intent is that this is going to be > > > treated as an addition to the spec (so before adoption there will be a > C++ > > > implementation and formal Vote). In the meantime it will be treated as > > > experimental? > > > > > > -Micah > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:19 AM Kyle Porter <ky...@bitquilltech.com > > > .invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Thanks Aldrin, > > > > > > > > Yes, Flight SQL should be language agnostic where the initial > > > > implementation is in Java. There are plans to create the C++ > > > implementation > > > > as well after, and then others can be worked on as needed. > > > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > > > *Kyle Porter* > > > > CEO > > > > Bit Quill Technologies Inc. > > > > Office: +1.778.331.3355 | Direct: +1.604.441.7318 | > > > ky...@bitquilltech.com > > > > https://www.bitquill.com > > > > > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) > and > > > may > > > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized > > > review, > > > > use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the > > > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and > destroy > > > > all copies of the original message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 9:15 AM Aldrin <akmon...@ucsc.edu.invalid> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thanks Kyle! > > > > > > > > > > Out of curiosity, I don't see links to FlightSQL PRs/issues for the > > > other > > > > > languages. I assume the proto itself would be language agnostic, > and I > > > > > haven't followed closely enough to know the status of > implementations > > > for > > > > > the other languages. Is that something that is usually tracked in > PRs > > > and > > > > > issues? > > > > > > > > > > I ask because the PR and linked JIRA issue have the [java] tag so > I am > > > > not > > > > > sure how much of this PR is java specific. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 08:47 Kyle Porter <ky...@bitquilltech.com > > > > .invalid> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hello All, > > > > > > > > > > > > We've been working on adding Flight SQL as a formal part of Arrow > > > > Flight > > > > > > and the PR is available for review at > > > > > > https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/10906. > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of the spec is now in place and, if you are interested, it > would > > > > be > > > > > > good to have more eyes on the PR. > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks! > > > > > > > > > > > > *Kyle Porter* > > > > > > CEO > > > > > > Bit Quill Technologies Inc. > > > > > > Office: +1.778.331.3355 | Direct: +1.604.441.7318 | > > > > > ky...@bitquilltech.com > > > > > > https://www.bitquill.com > > > > > > > > > > > > This email message is for the sole use of the intended > recipient(s) > > > and > > > > > may > > > > > > contain confidential and privileged information. Any > unauthorized > > > > > review, > > > > > > use, disclosure, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not > the > > > > > > intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and > > > > destroy > > > > > > all copies of the original message. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > Aldrin Montana > > > > > Computer Science PhD Student > > > > > UC Santa Cruz > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
