James Lamb created ARROW-2350:
-
Summary: Shrink size of spark_integration Docker container
Key: ARROW-2350
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2350
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type:
I know in Spark we’ve benefited by having some of the different language
devs act as RMs and each time that language dev has ended up improving a
bunch of how their components packaging has been done. Not to suggest we
should just do what other projects do, but maybe an idea to consider?
On Fri, M
Wes McKinney created ARROW-2349:
---
Summary: [Python] Boost shared library bundling is broken for MSVC
Key: ARROW-2349
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2349
Project: Apache Arrow
Sounds good to me
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 11:10 AM Li Jin wrote:
> Works for me. Thanks!
>
> On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > hi folks,
> >
> > With the USA DST transition, there was some confusion about the timing
> > of the Arrow sync call this week.
> >
> > To mitigat
Kouhei Sutou created ARROW-2348:
---
Summary: [GLib] Remove Go example
Key: ARROW-2348
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2348
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Type: Improvement
Hey!
I've done a little research about implementing arrow in rust and I'd like to
share
my thoughts. Please Andy correct me if I'm wrong, still hiking rust's learning
curve.
My first plan was to re-implement iron-arrow and mirror the cpp api as close as
possible, but realized that rust can prov
Works for me. Thanks!
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 2:03 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi folks,
>
> With the USA DST transition, there was some confusion about the timing
> of the Arrow sync call this week.
>
> To mitigate DST issues, I suggest that we meet at 9AM US Pacific /
> 12PM US Eastern, regardle
hi folks,
With the USA DST transition, there was some confusion about the timing
of the Arrow sync call this week.
To mitigate DST issues, I suggest that we meet at 9AM US Pacific /
12PM US Eastern, regardless of DST or not. After the Europe DST
transition this Sunday, this is:
09:00 in San Fran
hi folks,
So, I want to bring light to the problems we are having delivering
binary artifacts after Arrow releases.
We have some amount of packaging automation implemented in
https://github.com/apache/arrow-dist using Travis CI and Appveyor to
upload packages to Bintray, a packaging hosting servi
Just "rust" would be fine for the top-level directory, I think.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 12:09 PM, Andy Grove wrote:
> OK I would be happy with that. How should I get started? Should I just
> create a PR to add a `rust` or `rust-native` root level directory with some
> starting code? I could do th
OK I would be happy with that. How should I get started? Should I just
create a PR to add a `rust` or `rust-native` root level directory with some
starting code? I could do that this weekend.
Thanks,
Andy.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2018 at 10:04 AM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > Wes - if we continue developin
> Wes - if we continue developing an a separate repo for now to prove
> commitment levels and get this further along does that actually make the IP
> clearance procedure harder with more individual contributors involved?
Yes, this will make things harder (since we will have to chase down
ICLA's
I probably shouldn't have used the term binding. I am primarily interested
in a native Rust implementation but it should be possible to have traits
defining the interface and two implementations - one native and one using
FFI to call C. Rust has zero overhead when calling C code typically. I need
t
Not knowing the Rust ecosystem very well, I'm interested in the
pros/cons of building and maintaining Rust bindings vs. a native Rust
implementation, or some hybrid of the two. Seems like both bindings
and native implementation could be part of the same codebase
potentially.
If we decide to import
My personal view (and I think I've seen others state this already here) is
that we should bring it into the repo sooner rather than later and work on
it there. The version is 0.1.0 so I think that sets peoples expectations
about how complete it is.
I think it is better for people to see it in the
Hi Andy/Paddy,
I also want to get involved in contributing towards rust bindings.
Request you to please add me also.
Regards,
Tarush
On Fri, 23 Mar 2018 at 8:14 PM, paddy horan wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I’m looking to get involved in contributing to the Rust implementation
> also, would love to s
Hi Andy,
I’m looking to get involved in contributing to the Rust implementation also,
would love to see it in the arrow repo sooner rather than later.
Should we identify what needs to be added to iron-Arrow before it’s ready to be
donated to the Apache repo?
Thanks,
Paddy
Get Outlook for iOS
Hi,
Congratulations on the release of the Go bindings for Arrow. I think Rust
should be next ;-)
I've been a bit distracted getting a release out in the day job but am now
working on iron-arrow and getting it ready to integrate with my project. I
hope to be able to put some time in this weekend o
Antoine Pitrou created ARROW-2347:
-
Summary: [Python] Multiple warnings with -Wconversion
Key: ARROW-2347
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2347
Project: Apache Arrow
Issue Typ
Antoine Pitrou created ARROW-2346:
-
Summary: [Python] PYARROW_CXXFLAGS doesn't accept multiple options
Key: ARROW-2346
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-2346
Project: Apache Arrow
20 matches
Mail list logo
