tstamp testMagicProperty consistently failing on Windows

The tstamp (antunit) test named "testMagicProperty" has been consistently failing (only) on Windows for a while now[1]. Both master and 1.9.x branches. The failure looks really odd and something that I haven't been able to understand yet. The one interesting bit to this failure, based on what I can

Re: junitlauncher task - support for system properties in a non-forked execution

Hi Stefan, On 22/08/18 12:00 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2018-08-16, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> However, I would like some inputs on whether such support for setting >> the system properties in a non-forked execution should be at the >> junitlauncher task level

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ivy-tests-ubuntu » ubuntu,JDK 1.7 (latest) #360

More of a FYI - The URLResolverTest failures, in this list, appear to be my fault, introduced in a commit I pushed this week. I will take a look tonight to see what the issue there is and fix (or rollback) my changes. -Jaikiran On 24/08/18 12:22 PM, Apache Jenkins Server wrote: > See >

Re: Build failed in Jenkins: Ant-Build-Matrix-master-Windows » JDK 10 b46 (Windows Only),Windows #771

I am going to disable this JDK 10 b46 against Windows job. It's been failing for a while and all due to infrastructure issues. I don't see any other JDK 10 (Windows) selection option either. Any objections to disabling these tests against this version, on Windows? -Jaikiran On 27/08/18 5:59 PM, A

Re: JDK 11: First Release Candidate available

Hi Rory, Except for one issue[1] in this release candidate build, so far the tests against this version have gone fine. A fix/patch has already been provided for that issue and it works fine. I plan to run some more extensive tests over the next few days against this version. [1] https://bugs.ope

Re: ant-ivy git commit: Update the release notes

More of a FYI - I'm still not convinced that my fix for this handles all the necessary cases (looks like the ArtifactOrigin#location gets used in various different ways), so I may either revert back my changes or decide to change it in a different way. So right now, in its current form, my changes

Re: new release

Hi Simon, Is there a specific issue that you want to be part of the release? -Jaikiran On 06/09/18 2:20 AM, Simon IJskes - QCG wrote: > Hi, > > Is it possible to cast a new release? If possible within 2 weeks? > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Apache+NetBeans+Release+Road

Re: Future of Ivy and IvyDE

Hello everyone, Here's an update to this discussion - for reasons noted in this discussion, the Ant PMC no longer has the ability to maintain Ivy project. This thread was started more than a year back and we were hoping that if there was enough interest then there would be some proposals to f

Re: OpenJDK Quality Outreach: JDK 23 is GA, JDK 24 EA builds

Hello David, I ran the Ant testsuite[1] against JDK 24 EA build 24-ea+21-2447 and no unexpected failures were encountered. [1] https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Ant/job/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/54/ -Jaikiran On 25/10/24 7:58 pm, David Delabassee wrote: Welcome to the late

Re: Ivy 2.5.2 incompatibility with JDK 21 due to Pack200 removal

Hello Michel, I've approved your account creation. Please go ahead and create a JIRA issue. I suspect, as a minimum you would require a fix like the one below: diff --git a/build.properties b/build.properties index 958dda11..f5c92fd9 100644 --- a/build.properties +++ b/build.properties @@ -44,

Re: Future of Ivy and IvyDE

ow. I will maintain the Ivy project (but extra volunteers are still very welcome !). I'll try to look into some of the open issues and pull requests in the next coming weeks and create a new release after that. Maarten Op dinsdag 8 oktober 2024 om 17:01:02 CEST schreef Jaikiran Pai :

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.5.3 Release

+1 Downloaded the apache-ivy-2.5.3-bin.zip from the dist location. Checked the NOTICE. Ran an old Ivy project using JDK 8. No issues encountered. -Jaikiran On 23/12/24 6:41 pm, Maarten Coene wrote: Hi all, I have built a release candidate for Ivy 2.5.3 The git tag of this release is: https

Re: Ivy git push not seen on CI

Hello Maarten, The job was correctly configured to use https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/ant-ivy.git as the git repo, but for some reason a fetch from that repo in the CI environment isn't fetching the latest commit that you made. Temporarily, I have switched that job to use https://github.

Re: Ivy git push not seen on CI

The gitbox repo is now up-to-date. -Jaikiran On 27/03/25 12:49 am, Maarten Coene wrote: Thanks Jaikiran! If I can do something to help you finding the issue, let me know. Maarten On Wed, Mar 26, 2025 at 1:50 AM Jaikiran Pai wrote: Hello Maarten, The job was correctly configured to use

Re: [PR] adding support for dependency management

Hello Per, I don't know if this mail was meant to be a FYI or a request for review. If it was the latter then the Ant dev mailing list isn't the right one. maven-resolver-ant-tasks is a project under the Maven umbrella and the Maven mailing lists are different. Details of those mailing lists i

Re: JDK 25 feature set is now frozen!

Hello David, I ran our Ant testsuite against JDK 25 build 25-ea+28-3381. On Linux all tests passed fine. However on Windows we are seeing a large number of test failures. I looked into those failures and those all relate to the "heads up" section in your mail about https://jdk.java.net/25/r

Re: In less than four weeks Ant's first release will be 25 years old

I haven't been around that long but this is really impressive indeed. Ant still gets used in several projects and I think it's a notable achievement that this build tool continues to be maintained and released. Not just that, the fact that it can be used across a wide range of Java versions -

Re: JDK 25 feature set is now frozen!

Hello Stefan, On 26/06/25 5:16 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2025-06-26, Jaikiran Pai wrote: > >> However on Windows we are seeing a large number of test failures. I >> looked into those failures and those all relate to the "heads up" >> section in your mai

Re: JDK 25 feature set is now frozen!

/Ant%20Master%20Linux%20(latest%20EA%20JDK)/59/ Please take a look at those 2 commits and I would like to hear if those look OK or would need to be handled differently. The newly proposed JDK property isn't used in these changes and we don't need to set it at least for the current te

Re: JDK 25 feature set is now frozen!

C_g5Hb2KAdXIEjIcV1uWhM&e= Please take a look at those 2 commits and I would like to hear if those look OK or would need to be handled differently. The newly proposed JDK property isn't used in these changes and we don't need to set it at least for the current tests. -Jaikiran On

<    1   2   3   4   5   6