Can somone please unsubscibe me from this mailing list or let me know how to
unsubscribe from this mailing list completely??
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, Jon Schneider wrote:
From: Jon Schneider
Subject: IvyDE 2.1.0 Release [VOTE]
To: "Ant Developers List"
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 1:5
On 25/02/2010 15:37, Niamath Khan wrote:
> Can somone please unsubscibe me from this mailing list or let me know how to
> unsubscribe from this mailing list completely??
>
>
send email to dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
Greets
>
>
> --- On Wed, 2/24/10, Jon Schneider wrote:
>
>
> From: Jon
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Niamath Khan
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Thu, February 25, 2010 3:37:48 PM
Subject: Re: IvyDE 2.1.0 Release [VOTE]
Can somone please unsubscibe me from this mailing list or let me know how to
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> I'd like to direct the Ant developers' attention to
> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48798 for discussion.
> I'm hesitant to commit this outright because I anticipate this being
> somewhat controversial. If noone responds
Please unsubscribe me from your email list.
Note: I have submit request earlier also to unsubscribe me from this mailing
list at dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org but still I have been receiving emails.
Niamath Khan
--- On Thu, 2/25/10, Balder Van Camp wrote:
From: Balder Van Camp
Subject:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 8:56 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> I'd like to direct the Ant developers' attention to
>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48798 for discussion.
BTW, I think the list is a better place for the dis
On Feb 25, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:39 PM, Matt Benson
wrote:
I'd like to direct the Ant developers' attention to
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48798 for
discussion.
I'm hesitant to commit this outright because I anticipa
That's indeed quiet controversial. It moves ant from a declarative style to
a more algorithmique language.
What I dislike is that a target can have some side effect on datatype.
Because id's are global, that will means that when you are using an id into
a task, you have to look at its definition
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:54:01 -0800 (PST), Maarten Coene
wrote:
> Tried to install IvyDE 2.1.0 from your staging update site and got the
> following error:
>
> Cannot complete the install because one or more required items could not
> be found.
> Software currently installed: Apache IvyDE
> 2.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
> Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such task ?
The benefits with conjunction with could be important, in
that you can "mix-in" specialized pre-defined builds dealing with
specific concerns (like JAXB pre-compilation
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
That's indeed quiet controversial. It moves ant from a declarative
style to
a more algorithmique language.
What I dislike is that a target can have some side effect on datatype.
Because id's are global, that will means that when you are us
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart
wrote:
Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such task ?
The benefits with conjunction with could be important, in
that you can "mix-in" specialized pre-defined buil
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:12 PM, Gilles Scokart wrote:
On 25 February 2010 17:53, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart
wrote:
Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such task ?
The benefits with conjunction with could be important, i
Matt Benson wrote:
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart
wrote:
Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such task ?
The benefits with conjunction with could be important, in
that you can "mix-in" specializ
On 25 February 2010 17:53, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart
> wrote:
> > Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such task ?
>
> The benefits with conjunction with could be important, in
> that you can "mix-in" specialized pre-defined
On Feb 25, 2010, at 1:55 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
Matt Benson wrote:
On Feb 25, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Gilles Scokart
wrote:
Did you have any example to demonstrates the benefits of such
task ?
The benefits with conjunctio
I don't know how many Eclipse users won't have this XML editor plugin?
I didn't do anything special, I only installed the "Eclipse Classic" package
which doesn't seem to have this plugin.
If the fix is trivial, maybe it's worth to create the release again? It would
certainly help people like me
Greetings all,
I am interested in perusing (and possibly contributing to) the IvyDE
source. I tried to check it out as per the directions here:
http://ant.apache.org/ivy/ivyde/download.cgi#svn
When I try to do so, however, it asks for credentials. What credentials
should I use for read-only
Change the protocol to http: rather than https: and that should do
the trick.
HTH,
Matt
On Feb 25, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Carl Myers wrote:
Greetings all,
I am interested in perusing (and possibly contributing to) the
IvyDE source. I tried to check it out as per the directions here:
http://
Matt,
Thanks for the quick reply. Maybe someone fixed it? I just tried again
and even with the https URL it worked ok for me. The other option, of
course, is that I might be smokin' the good stuff =) Not sure.
Anyways, thanks =)
-Carl
Matt Benson wrote:
Change the protocol to http: rath
Oh, that was probably a temporary problem they were having with svn
whereby nobody, even committers, could access it. :) I got bitten
by it around that same time. -Matt
On Feb 25, 2010, at 7:40 PM, Carl Myers wrote:
Matt,
Thanks for the quick reply. Maybe someone fixed it? I just trie
On 2010-02-25, wrote:
> make condition evaluator work for restricted types, which most
> conditions are
Must have been sheer luck that I have only tested conditions that were
non-restricted.
Thanks
Stefan
-
To unsubsc
22 matches
Mail list logo
