Please enter a bugzilla bug report for this.
It would be nice if the entry contained a tar.gz/or/zip file containing
a example jepp usage - with the relevant/needed jar files in a lib
directory, and better a use of an ant-contrib loop to cause the
problem to happen. and even nicer an simple webte
> Author: peterreilly
> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008
> New Revision: 641903
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev
> Log:
> Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task
IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should
be merged into the branc
As far as I am aware, there is currently no nightly build.
The easiest way to get a version is to check out the ant trunk and compile
it yourself.
-> use java5 to have the same compiler as the ant release
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ echo $JAVA_HOME
/usr/java/jdk5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ mkdir y
[EMAIL PR
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Author: peterreilly
Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008
New Revision: 641903
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev
Log:
Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task
IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should
be merged int
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >> Author: peterreilly
> >> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008
> >> New Revision: 641903
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=641903&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multipl
+1 from me.
Peter
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> > >> Author: peterreilly
> > >> Date: Thu Mar 27 10:09:53 2008
> > >> New Revision: 641903
>
+1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys ;-).
To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should put a note in our
doc saying that using the settings task with an id requires 1.7.1.
Or is there any workaround we could implement in ivy settings task ?
Gilles
On
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys
> ;-).
>
> To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should put a note in our
> doc saying that using the settings task with an id requires 1.7.
I just confirmed the fix. It works great. When a new beta/rc is out, I
will test the real distribution to confirm once again.
Thanks
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 6:53 AM
To: Ant Developers List
Cc: Buck, Robert
Subject:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:37 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Bugzilla 44689: NPE with multiple targets and id's in task
>
> IMHO the bug is serious enough to be fixed in 1.7.1 final and should
> be merged into the branch.
+1. --DD
-
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure from the Ivy guys
> ;-).
> >
> > To come back to the impact on Ivy, I think we should
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Congratulations on doing the release Kevin,
Yep, I second that. Thanks Kev! --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional comma
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 1:23 PM, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > +1 for me as well (let's put a little bit more presure
Hi,
A user just complained about not being able to receive notifications of
comments on JIRA issue while being a watcher of the issue. I made a test
myself on the same issue, and I didn't get the notification either. I've
tried to check the configuration for Ivy project in JIRA, I see the
notifica
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > For the record, I think it's bad Ant style to use ids in tasks. [...]
>
> I think we use that bad pattern. We've been wondering about the best fo
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > > For the record, I think it's bad Ant style to use ids i
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] In Ivy original design I tried to make using Ivy
> as easy as possible. Hence if you want to use the default settings, and have
> an ivy file called ivy.xml in your basedir, then using Ivy is as simple as:
>
>
>
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > [...] In Ivy original design I tried to make using Ivy
> > as easy as possible. Hence if you want to use the default settings, and
> ha
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 12:40 PM, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:10 PM, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Yes, you're right. So I agree that to be really clean and follow the Ant
> way, settings should be a data type and we should support the three kind
Hi,
after my changes to fix IVY-716, the following methods on DependencyResolver
are no longer used:
String[] listTokenValues(String token, Map otherTokenValues);
OrganisationEntry[] listOrganisations();
ModuleEntry[] listModules(OrganisationEntry org);
RevisionEntry[] listRevisions(ModuleEntry
Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use the
settingsId attribute instead?
instead of
Maarten
- Original Message
From: Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ant Developers List
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:31:42 PM
Subject: Ivy settings id (was Re:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Maarten Coene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can't we just deprecate the "id" attribute on the settings task and use the
> settingsId attribute instead?
id is handled by Ant itself, in the core. I don't think you can deprecate it.
And that doesn't change the fact t
I think that the image dependent tasks should be moved to a separate
antlib.
And the NetRexx tasks I wonder whether we should go on maintaining them.
I never saw anything mentioning that they are used at all.
Regards,
Antoine
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL P
23 matches
Mail list logo
