Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
FYI I've created three issues related to license in .patterns (IVY-747), ant.jar exclusion in bin-with-deps (IVY-748), and removing jars from distrib directory (IVY-749). Xavier On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Xavier Hanin <[EMAIL

Ivy settings ant error

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
Hi, In latest Ivy version we have changed the way to load settings, using a task instead of a datatype, but still using an id attribute. The code of the task is available here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ant/ivy/core/trunk/src/java/org/apache/ivy/ant/IvyAntSettings.java A user is complainin

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
Xavier Hanin wrote: I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Do you vote for the release of these binaries? Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues with the current code from svn: - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or e

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
Adrian Sandor wrote: Xavier Hanin wrote: I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. Do you vote for the release of these binaries? Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues with the current code from svn: - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":licen

Re: AW: Tasks in parallel

2008-02-27 Thread Vijay Aravamudhan
hi, Jan: I can see your point, but with huge projects in which the final artifacts are converted to exe's with a tool like Excelsior Jet, that would not be an option. This is the same scenario where I am in right now. Stefan: Yes - the copy task would be a poor example ie the presence of an opt

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Adrian Sandor wrote: > > Xavier Hanin wrote: > >> I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. > >> > >> Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > >> > > Well, I don't really have time to test it; h

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:51 AM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Xavier Hanin wrote: > > I have built a second release candidate for Ivy 2.0.0-beta2. > > > > Do you vote for the release of these binaries? > > > Well, I don't really have time to test it; however I noticed 2 issues > wit

[OT] BugZilla new look?

2008-02-27 Thread Dominique Devienne
I have to confess going to BugZilla for the first time in a while, and was surprised by the new look. It's much different and "bigger" (more scrolling, bigger buttons, strange layout, etc...) Not sure it improves on the old visually, although it may in functionality. Is this a nudge toward JIRA? ;-

bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Koberg
Hi, I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It produces a META-INF/service rather than META-INF/services: /** * Write SPI Information to JAR */ private void writeServices(ZipOutputStream zOut) throws IOException { Iterator serviceIterator;

Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks, this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1. In the meantime, the nested element should not be used. Peter On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It > produce

OT: META-INF/services - was Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Koberg
OK, sounds good. And apologies for this OT response, but what do you guys think of using this? I just found out about it and really like it, but have only read a few articles. Any pros or cons? Perhaps it is a nice, clean way for Ant to go? best, -Rob On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:15 +, Peter Re

Re: [OT] BugZilla new look?

2008-02-27 Thread Matt Benson
I believe ASF infra just decided to upgrade BZ to a later version. :) -Matt --- Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to confess going to BugZilla for the first > time in a while, and > was surprised by the new look. It's much different > and "bigger" (more > scrolling, bigger

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Adrian Sandor
> > > > - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or elements > > > from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle Attribution". > > > During validation against this schema, ambiguity would be created for > > > those two particles. > Created IVY-750 > > > - in SFTPReposi

Re: [VOTE] Ivy 2.0.0-beta2 Release (second attempt)

2008-02-27 Thread Xavier Hanin
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Adrian Sandor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > - [Error] :43:30: cos-nonambig: "":license and WC[##any] (or > elements > > > > from their substitution group) violate "Unique Particle > Attribution". > > > > During validation against this schema, ambiguity wou