OK, sounds good.
And apologies for this OT response, but what do you guys think of using
this? I just found out about it and really like it, but have only read a
few articles. Any pros or cons? Perhaps it is a nice, clean way for Ant
to go?
best,
-Rob
On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:15 +0000, Peter Reilly wrote:
> Thanks,
> this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1.
>
> In the meantime, the <service> nested element should not be used.
>
> Peter
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It
> > produces a META-INF/service rather than META-INF/services:
> >
> >
> > /**
> > * Write SPI Information to JAR
> > */
> > private void writeServices(ZipOutputStream zOut) throws IOException
> > {
> > Iterator serviceIterator;
> > Service service;
> >
> > serviceIterator = serviceList.iterator();
> > while (serviceIterator.hasNext()) {
> > service = (Service) serviceIterator.next();
> > //stolen from writeManifest
> > super.zipFile(service.getAsStream(), zOut,
> > "META-INF/service/" + service.getType(),
> > System.currentTimeMillis(), null,
> > ZipFileSet.DEFAULT_FILE_MODE);
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Bug?
> >
> > best,
> > -Rob
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
