[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dotnet-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dotnet-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

BTW, is this stuff truly broken and needs attention, or is this ongoing breakage due to some (unfixable?) Gump weirdness? -Matt --- Gump Integration Build <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To whom it may engage... > > This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited > one. For > more in

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

On 8/27/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, is this stuff truly broken and needs attention, It does not work from the command line, but one needs internet access to fix it (and Stefan's antunit logger change to debug it). I think that a difference svn repository should be used for th

svn commit: r570188 - in /ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam: ./ branches/ tags/ trunk/

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Aug 27 10:28:15 2007 New Revision: 570188 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570188&view=rev Log: adding starteam antlib Added: ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/ ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/branches/ ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/tags/ ant/sandbox/antl

svn commit: r570189 - /ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/trunk/

Author: peterreilly Date: Mon Aug 27 10:30:46 2007 New Revision: 570189 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570189&view=rev Log: adding commons pointer Modified: ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/trunk/ (props changed) Propchange: ant/sandbox/antlibs/starteam/trunk/ --

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/27/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BTW, is this stuff truly broken and needs attention, > It does not work from the command line, but one > needs internet access to fix it It once worked but then the svn repo used i

componentdef related ivy-test failure in Gump

Hi, currently Ivy's tests fail in Gump and the error message talks about componentdef in org/apache/tools/ant/antlib.xml being undefined. Something in the build seems to trigger loading of the antlib descripto

Re: Local Properties

On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > I have updated the local properties patch to > make use of the new PropertyHelper delegate infrastructure. > (see: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23942) Still haven't found the time to actually look at the

Re: componentdef related ivy-test failure in Gump

It could be caused by mixing ant versions (ant 1.7.0 or 1.6.5 and ant-trunk). I have not had time yet to check the ivy build, however I do notice a depency on ant 1.6.5 in the ivy.xml file https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/ivy/core/trunk/ivy.xml Peter On 8/27/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL

Re: Local Properties

On 8/27/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 22 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > I have updated the local properties patch to > > make use of the new PropertyHelper delegate infrastructure. > > (see: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

Re: timezone for junitreport, and antlib

Thanks for the help! It would be nice to do in XSLT, and that looks like a good function, but I gather that it requires XSLT 2.0, so Saxon. I'm using the JDK 1.5 built-in, Apache XSLTC. Using Saxon for junitreport looks a little difficult, so I'm leaning toward the other approach, but please

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

On 8/27/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 8/27/07, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> BTW, is this stuff truly broken and needs attention, > > > It does not work from the command line, but one > > needs inter

Re: Setting Xalan to junitreport

Has there been any more action on this issue? I searched for junitreport in Bugzilla but didn't find it. I'm interested in using some XSLT 2 for junitreport. I guess that means Saxon instead of JDK 1.5's XSLTC. Cheers, 11011011 Weston, Toby wrote: Hi Antoine, Sounds great, is that the po

Re: componentdef related ivy-test failure in Gump

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It could be caused by mixing ant versions (ant 1.7.0 or 1.6.5 and > ant-trunk). I have not had time yet to check the ivy build, however > I do notice a depency on ant 1.6.5 in the ivy.xml file > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubat

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/27/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > (and Stefan's antunit logger change to debug it). >> >> Nope, this is really needed for the dotnet-antlib test failure.

Re: Local Properties

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 8/27/07, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> How does nesting of locals work? If a macro calls another macro, >> are the properties set in the outer macro available to the inner? >> What about subbuilds invoked from insid

Re: Setting Xalan to junitreport

On Mon, 27 Aug 2007, J. David Beutel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has there been any more action on this issue? Well, yes and no. delegates to under the covers (in 1.7) but you don't get access to the factory nested element. > I searched for junitreport in Bugzilla but didn't find it. I'm >