DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40760] New: - Notify property expansion

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Errors/Failures while running the Ant 1.7.0Beta3 tests

On 10/16/06, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I got these errors or failures while running the Ant1.7.0Beta3 tests : My environment is JDK 1.5, Windows 2000, cygwin. I will try to fix the JUnitTaskTest NullPointer exception, it is quite clear where it comes from. JUnit fail

AW: Errors/Failures while running the Ant 1.7.0Beta3 tests

>> I will try to fix the JUnitTaskTest NullPointer exception, it is quite >> clear where it comes from. >> >> >> JUnit failures/errors >> >> * SignJarTest >> >> testPreserveLastModifiedErrorjarsigner returned: 1 >> >> * JUnitTaskTesttestTimeoutError >java.lang.NullPointerEx

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

svn commit: r464439 - /ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java

Author: jhm Date: Mon Oct 16 03:18:40 2006 New Revision: 464439 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464439 Log: typo Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/Main.java URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40703] - Demo build file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

svn commit: r464468 - in /ant/core/trunk: fetch.xml lib/libraries.properties lib/xercesImpl.jar lib/xml-apis.jar

Author: stevel Date: Mon Oct 16 05:40:48 2006 New Revision: 464468 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464468 Log: Move up to Xerces 2.8.1. I tried using Maven to do it, but the artifacts are out of date, inconsistent, and with dirty dependencies. Modified: ant/core/trunk/fetch.xm

references: backwards compatibility

My test code broke this am, since the update. The cause? I was not explicitly depending on something that had needed run.classpath defined, but the automatic-reference definition stuff had been letting me get away with a (defective) build file. I did fix it, but wasted some time before decid

svn commit: r464498 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html

Author: jhm Date: Mon Oct 16 06:57:50 2006 New Revision: 464498 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464498 Log: Document two launch options. Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/c

svn commit: r464500 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html

Author: jhm Date: Mon Oct 16 07:05:44 2006 New Revision: 464500 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464500 Log: Codestyle (indent of bracket) and overwrite the taskname for logging. Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html

svn commit: r464502 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html

Author: jhm Date: Mon Oct 16 07:07:03 2006 New Revision: 464502 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464502 Log: We drop Win98 support. http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=115141884812670&w=2 Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/running.html Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21562] - Document Exit Code

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34055] - Missing documentation on ExecuteJava task

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26770] - Ant hangs on on Windows 98

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: references: backwards compatibility

I think some kind of property ant.policy.references.inline or something could be set to turn on old behaviour We've somehow never done it, but maybe we should have a version attribute on , and increment it whenever we introduce a BC breaking change? I'm not sure it's practical to provide both t

Re: Errors/Failures while running the Ant 1.7.0Beta3 tests

>You need to use the svn version of antunit it is a fix for >system properties. Then we must build a new version of antunit and update the lib\optional\ant-antunit*.jar IMO an Ant release must pass its tests with provided testlibs (junit,antunit). +1 ;-) --DD

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34328] - Cannot open zip file created using task in ANT 1.5.4 using WINZIP Tool

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: references: backwards compatibility

On 10/16/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think some kind of property ant.policy.references.inline or something > could be set to turn on old behaviour We've somehow never done it, but maybe we should have a version attribute on , and increment it whenever we introduce a BC

svn commit: r464506 - /ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW

Author: mbenson Date: Mon Oct 16 07:35:42 2006 New Revision: 464506 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464506 Log: remove an extra space Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW?view=diff&rev=46

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37099] - junit fails with xmlformatter and forkmode perbatch/once (but not pertest)

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: references: backwards compatibility

WARNING: reference y has not been set, attempting to resolve [echo] y is C:\Documents and Settings\reilly\learning\a\refs\build.xml I really think we should break BC here, with a good error message. Keeping the old behavior would re-open the bug about the not-defined-at-runtime ref being us

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37787] - Timeout of task ignored on Windows when programm runs subprocess.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5003] - exec task does not return after executed command finished on Windows only

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22129] - Provide a way to specify default excludes in a property file

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r464518 - /ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW

Author: stevel Date: Mon Oct 16 08:27:01 2006 New Revision: 464518 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=464518 Log: Move up to Xerces 2.8.1. Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW Modified: ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/WHATSNEW?view=diff&rev=

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29441] - xmllogger throws misleading Exception

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: references: backwards compatibility

On 10/16/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WARNING: reference y has not been set, attempting to resolve > > [echo] y is C:\Documents and Settings\reilly\learning\a\refs\build.xml I really think we should break BC here, with a good error message. Keeping the old behavior wou

Re: references: backwards compatibility

Hi Dominique, this sounds like a good idea. Regards, Antoine Original-Nachricht Datum: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 09:58:58 -0500 Von: "Dominique Devienne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: "Ant Developers List" Betreff: Re: references: backwards compatibility > > WARNING: reference y has not bee

Re: references: backwards compatibility

Peter Reilly wrote: On 10/16/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WARNING: reference y has not been set, attempting to resolve > > [echo] y is C:\Documents and Settings\reilly\learning\a\refs\build.xml I really think we should break BC here, with a good error message. Keepi

Re: references: backwards compatibility

I would make it a non-failing warning for ant1.7, maybe an error in 1.8. I can see where you are coming from, but I disagree on accepting the old build files, or at least not without a --keep-old-broken-behavior switch on the command line, instead of yet another magic property. --DD --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40643] - Allow dependency injection on child tasks

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: references: backwards compatibility

On Mon, 16 Oct 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > what do other people think? I'm with Steve here. We need a way to get around broken build files of projects you want to build but don't own. I don't care much whether it is a property (would be in line with other things we've introd

Re: Errors/Failures while running the Ant 1.7.0Beta3 tests

Do we want to start a voting thread for a release of antunit ? Regards, Antoine Dominique Devienne wrote: >> >You need to use the svn version of antunit it is a fix for >> >system properties. > >> Then we must build a new version of antunit and update the >> lib\optional\ant-antunit*.jar >> IMO

[AntUnit] Ready for Beta2?

Hi, Peter's comment on the "Ant 1.7beta3 released" thread says Ant needs a newer version than beta1 of AntUnit to pass the tests. This was to be expected since we wanted to use Ant core as an indicator for bugs and missing pieces. Is anybody actively experimenting with something in AntUnit right

Re: Property expansion notification interesting?

On Mon, 09 Oct 2006, Marc Guillemot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > would it make sense that Ant notify listeners (or a special sort of > listeners) of property expansions? even though you later say it is "not really easy", I think PropertyHelper should be used for things like that. If it is too cu

Re: [AntUnit] Ready for Beta2?

Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > If not I'll build new beta releases and call for a vote on them later > this week. > > Stefan > > +1 Good morning Europe, Antoine - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [antunit] test failures

On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay--looks like it's because the jars that contain > the matcher impls aren't added to forked junit. > Furthermore, as some of you are probably aware, it's > been this way pretty much ever since the Ant jars were > broken up. Looks l