On Wed, 11 Oct 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay--looks like it's because the jars that contain > the matcher impls aren't added to forked junit. > Furthermore, as some of you are probably aware, it's > been this way pretty much ever since the Ant jars were > broken up. Looks like Stefan added AntMain to the > classes to make sure were available for 1.6.0 .
I don't remember the details but I think we needed something from ant-launcher.jar because of a dependency of some other classes that get loaded by the forked VM. So it was not an attempt to get all of Ant seen by the forked VM but more an attempt to get enough of Ant seen to work at all. > I'm not sure what's the best way to address this. For now I am > going to default junit.fork to false in AntUnit. I'd say we explicitly include the required parts of Ant in the classpath of the forked tests. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
