Seeking feedback on possible macrodef augmentation

It strikes me that we don't have a utility to declaratively build custom conditions from others; macrodef would seem the obvious choice for, e.g.: But the result amounts to a Task: executable, but unavailable for use where conditions would be available. Would i

RE: Resource.getURL()

> -Original Message- > From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2006 6:28 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: RE: Resource.getURL() [snip] > > Matt: > > > > Can you expand on what you mean by "a string representation of a > > Resource"? > > Are y

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project svn-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project svn-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37655] - really unhelpful error when ,, is in a dependency target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Resource.getURL()

> -Original Message- > From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, 26 September 2006 12:56 PM > To: dev@ant.apache.org > Subject: Re: Resource.getURL() > > On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> From: Matt Benson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project dotnet-antlib-test (in module ant-antlibs) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project dotnet-antlib-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37655] - really unhelpful error when ,, is in a dependency target

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40608] New: - / would gain from a grammar caching

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

svn commit: r450067 - /ant/core/trunk/build.xml

Author: mbenson Date: Tue Sep 26 07:50:40 2006 New Revision: 450067 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450067 Log: attempt to fix Gump failures Modified: ant/core/trunk/build.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/build.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/build.xml?view=d

bugzilla target milestones

Can we have ant1.7.1 and ant1.8 added as target milestones under bugzilla? I want to postpone some things - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Seeking feedback on possible macrodef augmentation

+1 Good idea, Matt. - Alexey. On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It strikes me that we don't have a utility to declaratively build custom conditions from others; macrodef would seem the obvious choice for, e.g.: But the result amounts to a T

Re: bugzilla target milestones

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can we have ant1.7.1 and ant1.8 added as target milestones under > bugzilla? Done Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-ma

svn commit: r450176 - /ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html

Author: mbenson Date: Tue Sep 26 13:16:27 2006 New Revision: 450176 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450176 Log: fix spelling Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html Modified: ant/antlibs/antunit/trunk/docs/assertions.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant

svn commit: r450204 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/ main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Provider.java main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Service.java tests/antunit/task

Author: peterreilly Date: Tue Sep 26 14:03:42 2006 New Revision: 450204 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450204 Log: New files for service element for Added: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/ ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Provi

[antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

When writing antunit tests, one cannot use the log-inspection assertions or the new au:logcontent resource outside the context of an AntUnit test. This is understandable/unavoidable, but it does mean that there are some tests that cannot be developed with 'ant -f ...'. Obviously you could write n

svn commit: r450207 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Provider.java main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Service.java tests/antunit/taskdefs/jar-spi-test.xml

Author: peterreilly Date: Tue Sep 26 14:10:32 2006 New Revision: 450207 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450207 Log: eol-style Modified: ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/types/spi/Provider.java (contents, props changed) ant/core/trunk/src/main/org/apache/tools

svn commit: r450209 - in /ant/core/trunk: CONTRIBUTORS WHATSNEW contributors.xml docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Jar.java

Author: peterreilly Date: Tue Sep 26 14:15:12 2006 New Revision: 450209 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450209 Log: Bugzilla 31520 adding SPI to jar-task This patch from bernd Dutkowski adds a nested element to the task this creates the SPI files - see doc. Modified: ant/cor

Re: Seeking feedback on possible macrodef augmentation

+1, It would however be nicer to make macrodef more generic. To inject the UEs into the macro instance. Like: Do not know if it is possible. Peter On 9/26/06, Alexey Solofnenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 Good idea, Matt. - Alexey. On 9/26/06, Matt Benson <[

Re: Seeking feedback on possible macrodef augmentation

Peter: as you are the father of macrodef your opinion was one I was very interested in getting. I'm not sure I understood your example below. Could you clarify, and maybe elaborate on any ideas you have of what we might try to make macrodef more generic (I assume you mean so that it would just "w

svn commit: r450234 - /ant/core/trunk/build.xml

Author: mbenson Date: Tue Sep 26 15:10:27 2006 New Revision: 450234 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450234 Log: I don't think Gump test-ant has failed properly for several months, if the fossil record is correct. :( Modified: ant/core/trunk/build.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40610] New: - ClassNotFoundException using with the location attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40547] - [Regression] path reference with path location fails

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40610] - ClassNotFoundException using with the location attribute

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r450238 - /ant/core/trunk/build.xml

Author: mbenson Date: Tue Sep 26 15:25:00 2006 New Revision: 450238 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450238 Log: a little more work Modified: ant/core/trunk/build.xml Modified: ant/core/trunk/build.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/build.xml?view=diff&rev=45

svn commit: r450239 - in /ant/core/trunk/src: etc/testcases/taskdefs/exec/apply.xml tests/antunit/taskdefs/exec/ tests/antunit/taskdefs/exec/apply-test.xml tests/antunit/taskdefs/exec/parrot.sh tests/

Author: mbenson Date: Tue Sep 26 15:26:13 2006 New Revision: 450239 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450239 Log: move apply tests to antunit, fixing bug 40331 in the process. Added: ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/exec/ ant/core/trunk/src/tests/antunit/taskdefs/exe

Re: [antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

Hopefully you get the idea. Uh, not really ;-) How crazy is this? Not crazy to me, because I implemented this once in the past on top of JUnit (if I half-undertood you). I had a custom TestRunner that accepted an additional -m testMethod switch. It slowly died when the new version of JUnit c

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects 1 p

Re: Seeking feedback on possible macrodef augmentation

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would however be nicer to make macrodef > more generic. To inject the UEs into the macro > instance. > > Like: > > > > provider="@{impl}"/> > > > > > > > Yes, that would indeed be very useful

Re: [antunit] included/excluded tests patterns

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When writing antunit tests, one cannot use the > log-inspection assertions or the new au:logcontent > resource outside the context of an AntUnit test. This > is understandable/unavoidable, Is it? We could add a task that registers a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project test-ant-no-xerces (in module ant) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project test-ant-no-xerces has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

Re: Resource.getURL()

On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Stephen McConnell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As such, some resource are implicitly file based (e.g. FileResource) > while other resources may (or may not) be resolvable to a local > file. What kind of resources would that be? > The important distinction here is that Path s

svn commit: r450341 - /ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html

Author: jhm Date: Tue Sep 26 23:21:47 2006 New Revision: 450341 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=450341 Log: typo Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html Modified: ant/core/trunk/docs/manual/CoreTasks/jar.html URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/ant/core/trunk/do

Hi I need some help

Could anyone tell me how to run the testcases of ant in eclipse ? I just mean the testcases in the trunk I checked out from the svn. Thanks.