Hopefully you get the idea.
Uh, not really ;-)
How crazy is this?
Not crazy to me, because I implemented this once in the past on top of JUnit (if I half-undertood you). I had a custom TestRunner that accepted an additional -m testMethod switch. It slowly died when the new version of JUnit came out, with heavy refactoring of TestRunner. But really I don't understand what's broken with AntUnit as you describe (or not!). --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
