DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26765] - "-f" option works incorrectly if path includes "../"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

task for antlib jars

Hi! I am using antlibs, and I face the normal problem in windows of not being able of deleting the file while it is used. I know this discussion must have probably taken place, I could not just find it :( Has there been any attempt to use File.deleteOnExit() as an option for the task? or

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26108] - delete task fails for jar file in CWD on WNT

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

notes on embedding ANT

I'm an ANT newbie. Please forgive any newbie offenses. I want to use ANT's task engine in my own app. I don't want to invoke it from a command line. I don't want to run individual tasks myself. I want to use the ANT engine internally to process an XML script. Maybe there is an established way

RE: ant -projecthelp

Yes and it does. An imported buildfile is part of your buildfile. So why not showing? Jan > -Original Message- > From: Mariano Benitez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:12 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: ant -projecthelp > > > should it include the

FW: Microsoft XML scripting patent

Good question. But I don´t know the answer :( Especially I don´t know how the patent relates to Ant. Maybe Alex Kipman knows more? Jan -Original Message- From: Jonathan Woods [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 8:01 AM To: user@ant.apache.org Subject: Microsoft XM

Re: are antlib taskdefs case sensitive?

Yes all taskdef's and typedef's are case-sensitive: For example: Hello will not work. Peter Mariano Benitez wrote: I defined in my antlib.xml taskdef="directorySchema" and in the build I used it failed saying it did not find task directoryschema, while if I put the correct case, it works, th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26901] - regex with file mapper incorrectly handles ${file.separator}

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: task for antlib jars

Mariano Benitez wrote: Hi! I am using antlibs, and I face the normal problem in windows of not being able of deleting the file while it is used. I know this discussion must have probably taken place, I could not just find it :( Has there been any attempt to use File.deleteOnExit() as an o

RE: notes on embedding ANT

> From: Paul F. Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 February 2004 04:59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: notes on embedding ANT > I want to use ANT's task engine in my own app. I don't want > to invoke it from a command line. I don't want to run > individual tasks myself. I want

RE: task for antlib jars

> From: Steve Loughran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Mariano Benitez wrote: > > Hi! > > > >I am using antlibs, and I face the normal problem in > windows of not > > being able of deleting the file while it is used. > > > >I know this discussion must have probably taken place, I > coul

RE: task for antlib jars

> Maybe what is needed here, is a way to tell ALL AntClassLoaders > to please close their open files (JARS) and reopen if needed later. > > After all, keeping the JARs open is just an optimization. Sounds like a flag ant -releaselibs ant.jar junit.jar Jan

RE: task for antlib jars

Or a small task that can be called at the right time on your build before deleting. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13 February 2004 11:14 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: task for antlib jars > > > > Maybe what is needed here, is

Ant 1.6.1 release / md5sum missing in the source distribution

Hi, I have received this email, and I can confirm that the md5sum files are missing for the *.tar.bz2, *.zip and *.tar.gz in the source directory. I do not understand why, I simply used the build.xml of ant and ran the distribution target, but the md5 sum files apparently did not get generated. A

Re: ant

Henk P. Penning wrote: Antoine, You may want to fix this: dist/ant/ant-current-src.zip.md5 is a dead symlink. regards. HPP Henk P. Penning, Dept of Computer Science, Utrecht University \__/ \ Padualaan 14, P.O. Box 80.089, 3508 TB Utrecht, The Netherlands. \__/ Telephone: +31-30-2534106, fa

Re: ant -projecthelp

I'm sorry, forgot it only shows the ones with description :) MAriano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes and it does. An imported buildfile is part of your buildfile. So why not showing? Jan -Original Message- From: Mariano Benitez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 12:12

RE: ant -projecthelp

If there is one with description - yes. If none of the targets has one, all are listed. Jan > -Original Message- > From: Mariano Benitez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 1:36 PM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: ant -projecthelp > > > I'm sorry, forgot

Re: Ant 1.6.1 release / md5sum missing in the source distribution

Now I have found the reason why I did not generate the md5sum files when building the ant 1.6.1 distribution. the task in the src-dist target failed, and md5sum files are normally generated after this delete. I had not paid attention to this failure. I do not know why the delete failed, maybe th

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

I went are read the sumary of the patent from the links provided. Not a layer, but I do not think it applies to ANT maybe to scriptdef, but that seemed like a streach. What I understood is that they pattented having a bunch of different scripts in different languages all sitting on the same file s

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

> So, it sound not like a pattent on scripting, but on > how to store collections of scripts in one file and being > able to execute them. as collection of scripts? Jan > > Any pattent layer around? > > Jose Alberto > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[E

Re: Microsoft XML scripting patent

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, it sound not like a pattent on scripting, but on how to store collections of scripts in one file and being able to execute them. as collection of scripts? Jan The example provided on the web page showing MS's patent show an xml file containing a .bat file and

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

Not only . You can do the same (storing) with Does the ASF have a layer to check that? Jan > -Original Message- > From: Antoine Lévy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 13, 2004 3:14 PM > To: Ant Develo

Re: Microsoft XML scripting patent

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not only . You can do the same (storing) with ]]>
Exactly, the patent descibes the contents of the ant "script" manual page: http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/script.html Peter Does the ASF have a layer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26632] - rexec hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

> >Not only . You can do the same (storing) with > > > > > > > ]]> > > > > > > > > > Exactly, the patent descibes the contents of the ant "script" > manual page: > http://ant.apache.org/manual/OptionalTasks/script.html > Peter And on [1] you

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

But is not a collection of scripts. is a collection of tasks in Java. That is what ANT provides, not scripts. In the worst case scenario, we are talking about wether the

RE: Microsoft XML scripting patent

> But is not a collection of scripts. > is a collection of tasks in Java. > That is what ANT provides, not scripts. Correct. The right equivalent is . But can (nearly) be rewritten with a containing only one

RE: task for antlib jars

> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Why does the antlib file or JAR would stay open beyond > loading the classes and reading the antlib.xml? > > Maybe what is needed here, is a way to tell ALL AntClassLoaders > to please close their open files (JARS) and reopen if needed lat

Re: Ant 1.6.1 release / md5sum missing in the source distribution

--- Antoine_Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now I have found the reason why I did not generate > the md5sum files when > building the ant 1.6.1 distribution. > the task in the src-dist target failed, and > md5sum files are > normally generated after this delete. > I had not paid attent

Re: task for antlib jars

that is why it makes more sense to me to define it as deleteOnExit, and not mess with trying to unload an antlib when I don't want it anymore. MAriano Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Why does the antlib file or JAR would stay open beyond loading th

Re: Ant 1.6.1 release / md5sum missing in the source distribution

Matt Benson wrote: --- Antoine_Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Now I have found the reason why I did not generate the md5sum files when building the ant 1.6.1 distribution. the task in the src-dist target failed, and md5sum files are normally generated after this delete. I had not pai

Re: Microsoft XML scripting patent

Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: I went are read the sumary of the patent from the links provided. Not a layer, but I do not think it applies to ANT maybe to scriptdef, but that seemed like a streach. What I understood is that they pattented having a bunch of different scripts in different languages a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26632] - rexec hangs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: task for antlib jars

> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Why does the antlib file or JAR would stay open beyond loading the > > classes and reading the antlib.xml? > > > > Maybe what is needed here, is a way to tell ALL AntClassLoa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26739] - should put all parameters into an external file when requested or automatically

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26921] New: - problem running task on multiple ejb jars

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26925] New: - API Documentation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26925] - API Documentation

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu