DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22007] New: - Copy task throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when a replacement token value is the empty string

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Why is Path.classpath final?

2003-07-31 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 07:30 am, Matt Bishop wrote: > If there was no good reason, can it be reverted to it's previous changeable > state? > Why are you changing it? This is meant to reflect the system classpath. Should it not be final? Conor --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22010] New: - ENTITY SYSTEM include files pits %20 in file then does not work.

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java

2003-07-31 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
java with spawn option is OK on Solaris; test case fixed. Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:25 PM Subject: cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs JavaTest.java > antoine 2003/0

Re: gmane access to ant mailing lists

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote, On 30/07/2003 20.51: Hi, I have noticed that it is not possible any more to access the ant mailing lists from the news.gmane.org server. They used to be accessible as gmane.comp.jakarta.ant.devel and gmane.comp.jakarta.ant.user. Since today the user list is not availab

Re: ImportTask ant 1.6

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Dominique Devienne wrote, On 30/07/2003 20.09: Why don't you put the import *after* the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21948] - PropertyTest.Test5 failing -trying to connect?

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: "echo"-task, ignorable whitespace and CDATA-elements

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Morten Mortensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It would be nice, if the "echo" task worked a bit different - > actually *ignored* leading and trailing whitespace in the body of > the text. It may be possible to make that an option, but not the default IMHO. I know a few build

Re: Implementing "conditions"

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In Ant 1.6, just write a class that implements Condition, > it, and use it inside . s/task/type/ Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: Implementing "conditions"

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Morten Mortensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ahhh! "addCondition()" is good! Then it *really* is, what I hoped it > to be. Is going to try it. (Can Peter Reilly also "deprecate" the > specific "add()"-method?? From my point of > view, here, it should be history.) deprecate

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 30/07/2003 21.14: Guys, I think that using C++ or C# as the model for ANT inheritance would be very bad. As I remember, the rules for resolving multiple inheritance in C++ are very complicated. Furthermore I don't know them ;-) I would propose using the XSLT model.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21948] - PropertyTest.Test5 failing -trying to connect?

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Implementing "conditions"

2003-07-31 Thread peter reilly
On Thursday 31 July 2003 07:55, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In Ant 1.6, just write a class that implements Condition, > > it, and use it inside . > > s/task/type/ Just to be sure: use and not to define the condition. I am writi

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs PropertyTest.java

2003-07-31 Thread peterreilly
peterreilly2003/07/31 02:03:46 Modified:src/etc/testcases/taskdefs property.xml src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs PropertyTest.java Log: Fix invalid URL for property test with url. PR: 21948 Revision ChangesPath 1.10

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21948] - PropertyTest.Test5 failing -trying to connect?

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18154] - Improve exceptions and logging behavior of Perforce Tasks

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce SimpleP4OutputHandler.java P4Base.java

2003-07-31 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/07/31 02:20:10 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/perforce SimpleP4OutputHandler.java P4Base.java Log: Improve logging and exception behavior of Perforce tasks PR: 18154 Submitted by: Matt

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18154] - Improve exceptions and logging behavior of Perforce Tasks

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22007] - Copy task throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when a replacement token value is the empty string

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22007] - Copy task throws StringIndexOutOfBoundsException when a replacement token value is the empty string

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18625] - : token with empty value throws IndexOutOfBoundsException

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4750] - jspc flattens directory structure when translating jsp->java

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

RE: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 30/07/2003 21.14: > > > > In escense, the idea is to associate a precedence to each > target (template in XSLT) > > and when we say target X in a dependency, what is meant is > the highest precedence X. >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4750] - jspc flattens directory structure when translating jsp->java

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4750] - jspc flattens directory structure when translating jsp->java

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote, On 31/07/2003 13.24: From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... Wait a second, does this mean that there is crosstalk between the lines 1, 2, 3? Yes, there is crosstalk and at least in XSLT this is a good thing. It means that you can write a bunch of file

override

2003-07-31 Thread Conor MacNeill
I'd like to take a slightly different angle on the issue by getting some thoughts on this little experimental task I wrote. I haven't cleaned it up at all (lots of unused imports, inner classes etc). Anyway it lets you override any target in the build. e.g. This build file

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4750] - jspc flattens directory structure when translating jsp->java

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
Looks interesting. Cheers, Antoine - Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2003 2:07 PM Subject: override > I'd like to take a slightly different angle on the issue by getting > some thoughts on this little experim

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Conor MacNeill wrote, On 31/07/2003 14.07: ... I think with a renaming task this would let you override any part of the build easily. Very cool indeed :-) [I'd like to thank all the ones that are discussing on import. Very nice posts and constructive stuff, I love you guys :-)] It seems that we

RE: override

2003-07-31 Thread Wannheden, Knut
This very much reminds me of what I was doing in our build environment. I basically had a template buildfile and could override that for any project like this: <.../> <.../> The difference is only that I didn't implement as a task (top-level tasks didn't exist back then). (Similar

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22010] - ENTITY SYSTEM include files pits %20 in file then does not work.

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:23 pm, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > The only thing that comes to mind is that I cannot use super ion > dependencies, which is a nifty feature :-( Not sure why this would be needed. Just add as the first contained task. All of the other dependencies will have been run by th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] New: - addition to task

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: override

2003-07-31 Thread Dominique Devienne
Indeed ;-) What you demoed Conor is precisely the use case I need, which was very much inspired by Knut's past posts. I also like Knut's name better, as it's more explicit. The one thing I'm not too sure about is the and ones... Why are these needed? Property immutability is one tenet of Ant we

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > PS: I checked the online manual, and didn't see . It's in the manual for CVS HEAD but not the online manual (as is not part of 1.5.x). Stefan - To unsubscrib

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread peter reilly
+1 for override[-target] +1 for include as import without target override sematics On Thursday 31 July 2003 15:25, Dominique Devienne wrote: > > PS: I checked the online manual, and didn't see . After the > discussion I had with Stefan, I thought it was there... Did I > misunderstand, or is it jus

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
Conor MacNeill wrote, On 31/07/2003 15.44: On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:23 pm, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: The only thing that comes to mind is that I cannot use super ion dependencies, which is a nifty feature :-( Not sure why this would be needed. Just add as the first contained task. All of the other

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 for include as import without target override sematics +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
I am willing to start changing based on the email of Conor of July 29th, 2003. I am of course more than happy if other committers want to participate in the exercise. > In fact I would like to rename as to reinforce the fact > that this is its primary function. In fact the problems we are seei

OpenVMS changes (was Re: FileUtils#normalize(File))

2003-07-31 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Knut Wannheden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the downside a FileUtils#toVMSPath(File) would push the OS > awareness responsibility up a level, in which case > Commandline.Argument.setFile(File) would have to check for OpenVMS > and call this method. I agree, Commandline.Arg

Re: override

2003-07-31 Thread Nicola Ken Barozzi
peter reilly wrote, On 31/07/2003 16.41: +1 for override[-target] +1 for include as import without target override sematics +1 for both here too. Maybe getting those working and combining them can make us see what/if extra functionality is needed for an . Since in Centipede I do not use directly

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:38 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > I am willing to start changing based on the email of Conor of July > 29th, 2003. > I am of course more than happy if other committers want to participate in > the exercise. > Cool. I think things are in flux for a few days more, though.

RE: override

2003-07-31 Thread Wannheden, Knut
Dominique, > Indeed ;-) What you demoed Conor is precisely the use case I > need, which was > very much inspired by Knut's past posts. I also like Knut's > name better, as it's more explicit. > > The one thing I'm not too sure about is the and > ones... Why are these needed? Property > immut

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22026] New: - Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook( ... ) with fork="true

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Any chance for fileset arithmetic?

2003-07-31 Thread Gus Heck
I've read this thread a bit, but maybe not completely. I'm not sure I understand, but I think you are talking about combining mappers and filesets such that filesets can perform mapping functions. It has been agreed that this would require modification of many tasks that use filesets so why

RE: OpenVMS changes (was Re: FileUtils#normalize(File))

2003-07-31 Thread Wannheden, Knut
Stefan, > > On the downside a FileUtils#toVMSPath(File) would push the OS > > awareness responsibility up a level, in which case > > Commandline.Argument.setFile(File) would have to check for OpenVMS > > and call this method. > > I agree, Commandline.Argument shouldn't need to be aware of this. >

RE: Why is Path.classpath final?

2003-07-31 Thread Matt Bishop
Path.classpath shouldn't be final any more than the property "java.class.path" is final, which it isn't. What would be interesting is a Path.classpath that reflected the _current_ value of "java.class.path", especially when a new AntClassLoader is created at runtime. -Original Message---

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 9348] - JspC task does not handle numeric file names

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22010] - ENTITY SYSTEM include files pits %20 in file then does not work.

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - addition to task

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - addition to task

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ant 1.5.4 : Import

2003-07-31 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:38 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > I am willing to start changing based on the email of Conor of July > > 29th, 2003. > > I am of course more than happy if other committers want to participate in > > the exercise. > > > > Cool. I think things are in flux for a few da

RE: override

2003-07-31 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 31 Jul 2003 10:23 pm, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > > > The only thing that comes to mind is that I cannot use super ion > > dependencies, which is a nifty feature :-( > > Not sure why this would be needed. Just add as the > first cont

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 4750] - jspc flattens directory structure when translating jsp->java

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22028] New: - Telnet task depenedency

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22020] - addition to task

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22028] - Telnet task depenedency

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 11585] - The Replace Task ignores properties with multiline replacements

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/etc junit-frames.xsl

2003-07-31 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/07/31 12:38:39 Modified:.WHATSNEW src/etc junit-frames.xsl Log: Display properly in junitreport the root package PR: 21915 Submitted by: J.M. (Martijn) Kruithof (ant at kruithof dot xs4all dot nl) Revision ChangesPath 1.475 +4

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21915] - [PATCH] junit-frames does not display the top package in a usable way.

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21947] - Junit Task - Xml reporter don't work well

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 22026] - Runtime.getRuntime().addShutdownHook( ... ) with fork="true

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21947] - Junit Task - Xml reporter don't work well

2003-07-31 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu