Ant status report (for board)

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
Status Report for the Ant project o Ant 1.5.2 Ant 1.5.2 was released on March 3, 2003 The zip refactoring that was undertaken to eliminate a number of zip/jar update bugs introduced a regression whereby some elements of the produced Zips could not be viewed by WinZIP. This required a followup

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20085] - If a propert is unset, property substitution does nothing

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Christoph Wilhelms
> PMC members, > > I'd like to move towards adoption of the bylaws draft. > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/ant/proposal/ant-site > /anakia/docs/bylaws.html?rev=1.16 > > Could you please view this and vote indicating your position. If > you wish to > vote -1 because you don't beli

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20093] New: - Cannot add condition under scope

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml

2003-05-21 Thread bruce
bruce 2003/05/20 23:08:58 Modified:proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs bylaws.html proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml Log: Fixed typos and made capitalization more consistent Revision ChangesPath 1.17 +19 -19ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs/byl

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Bruce Atherton
At 09:41 AM 5/21/2003 +1000, Conor MacNeill wrote: No, fixing typos wouldn't affect the vote, so please go ahead and fix them :-) Ok, done. But in proofing the document I realized there was another issue that may be a significant typo or may just require a bit more editing. The responsibilities s

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/Integration VAJAntTool.html

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/20 23:34:39 Modified:docs/manual/Integration VAJAntTool.html Log: spam-protect Francois Rey per his request Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/Integration/VAJAntTool.html Index: VAJAntTool.html

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/20 23:37:06 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Javadoc.java Log: Fix self assignment - PR: 19288 - Submitted by: Thierry Lach Revision ChangesPath 1.115 +1 -1 ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/Javadoc.java Index: Javadoc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19288] - Add noqualifier attribute to javadoc task

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20093] - Cannot add condition under scope

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 20 May 2003, Gus Heck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I plan to patch the docs to reflect this and the fact that they seem > to accept the verbose atribute as well. Thanks, I forgot they extended ExecuteOn. I'll take care of myself. Think that's all. > Other things I have noticed is that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20079] - [PATCH] chown and chgrp documentation needs update

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ant status report (for board)

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
+1 to the report as a whole. On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > While active, the discussion has not been heated and the community > appears healthy. The most important piece to me. Stefan

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant - New directory

2003-05-21 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/05/21 00:16:29 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant - New directory

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant/subant-test1 - New directory

2003-05-21 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/05/21 00:16:41 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant/subant-test1 - New directory

cvs commit: ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant/subant-test2 - New directory

2003-05-21 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/05/21 00:16:52 ant/src/etc/testcases/taskdefs/subant/subant-test2 - New directory

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary > URIs for ant type definitions? > I do not think this is a good idea. I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI themselves. Could anybody pl

cvs commit: ant/src/testcases/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAntTest.java

2003-05-21 Thread antoine
antoine 2003/05/21 00:27:26 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.java proposal/xdocs/src/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs SubAnt.xml docs/manual/CoreTasks subant.html Added: src/etc/testcases/taskdefs subant.xml src/etc/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18715] - [PATCH] to specify basedir to

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18391] - RFE : ignoreMissingBuildFiles option for subant

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18715] - [PATCH] to specify basedir to

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread peter reilly
Ok fair enough. I still think that the URI specified at the "typedef" task should be restricted, if only to allow future versions of ant to support other forms of processing based on URIs without affecting build scripts that specify URIs using "typedef". I do not see that this is a big restriction

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread peter reilly
On Wednesday 21 May 2003 08:21, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary > > URIs for ant type definitions? > > I do not think this is a good idea. > > I've seen that Costin and Conor pre

cvs commit: ant KEYS

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/21 01:26:42 Modified:.KEYS Log: New signature by ct magazine that may give my sig more trust with German users 8-) Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +19 -4 ant/KEYS Index: KEYS ==

Re: Free-form ANT Task Structure

2003-05-21 Thread peter reilly
Here is a simple example task: import java.util.*; import org.apache.tools.ant.DynamicConfigurator; import org.apache.tools.ant.Task; public class Dy extends Task implements DynamicConfigurator { private String subName; private Map attributes = new HashMap(); private List elem

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20103] New: - FileSet horrible performance when dir has huge number of subdirs

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20079] - [PATCH] chown and chgrp documentation needs update

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/21 01:55:36 Modified:docs/manual/CoreTasks chmod.html docs/manual/OptionalTasks attrib.html chgrp.html chown.html Log: Update docs of tasks that inherit new features of - PR: 20079 Revision ChangesPath 1.12 +1 -1 ant/docs/manual/C

antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
I have prepared a few days ago some html pages located under http://ant.apache.org/projects/antlib/index.html They might be interesting if you want to read more about the proposal of Jose Alberto Fernandez. These pages do not explain yet the proposal of Peter Reilly due to the fact that I had pr

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
There's one thing I don't like, the "Adoption of New Codebase" part under "Actions". As the text is it reads (at least I read it that way) as if "Rules for Revolutionaries" were the only possible way to adopt a new code base. Apart from the fact that I personally don't like RfR too much, I think t

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 21 May 2003 05:21 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI > themselves. Could anybody please explain why - and at the same time > please also explain why user choice would be bad here? I feel I must > be missing something. There

Re: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 21 May 2003 06:58 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > I still think that the roles concept is good and I would like to make a > separate proposal for roles. My idea would be along the following lines, > supposing that ant is being used by specialists of geometry : > > > class="org.apache.

cvs commit: ant/xdocs external.xml

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/21 03:09:11 Modified:docs external.html xdocsexternal.xml Log: Add pointer to CMSDeploy. Submitted by: Maso Gato Revision ChangesPath 1.116 +49 -0 ant/docs/external.html Index: external.html =

RE: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 21 May 2003 06:58 pm, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote: > > > > I still think that the roles concept is good and I would > like to make a > > separate proposal for roles. My idea would be along the > following lines, > > supposing that ant i

RE: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
Antoine, Great job, I think you have sumarized alot of the discussion quite well. Thanks, Jose Alberto > -Original Message- > From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 21 May 2003 09:58 > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: antlib > > > I have prepared a few days ago

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20110] New: - Ant Dirname task behavior change/attribute request

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 21 May 2003 08:31 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > Well I have to say you are mistaken, in my proposal the task (container) > implemented the addConfigured(InterfaceRole) method. The interface was > for the thing being passed (the child element, after possibly some > adaptor). > Well

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19636] - wrong paths in zip-files

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 21 May 2003 04:19 pm, Bruce Atherton wrote: > > Ok, done. > Great - thanks. > But in proofing the document I realized there was another issue that may be > a significant typo or may just require a bit more editing. > > The responsibilities section says this: > > The PMC may consider the

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point, 2/3 majority is fine by me. +1 Stefan

cvs commit: ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml

2003-05-21 Thread conor
conor 2003/05/21 05:23:36 Modified:proposal/ant-site/anakia/docs bylaws.html proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml Log: Update proposal to remove RfR and add subproject creation clause Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +106 -103 ant/proposal/ant-site/an

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Wed, 21 May 2003 07:41 pm, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Do we need to refer to RfR at all? No. Actually I don't like RfR either. I've removed it and added a snippet to cover new sub-project creation here too. Refer to the recent commit and let me know what you think. Should the latter be restric

Re: cvs commit: ant/proposal/ant-site/anakia/xdocs bylaws.xml

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 21 May 2003, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Update proposal to remove RfR and add subproject creation clause +1 8-) Stefan

Re: [PMC VOTE] Adoption of Bylaws

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 21 May 2003, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Refer to the recent commit and let me know what you think. I've already done so 8-) +1 on the bylaws as they are right now. > Should the latter be restricted to PMC members? Proposal of subprojects should not be restricted to PMC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 19953] - junit timeouts and formatter not found

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20020] - ANTLR.java invalid command-line argument: -traceTreeWalker;

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ANTLR.java

2003-05-21 Thread bodewig
bodewig 2003/05/21 06:29:55 Modified:src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional ANTLR.java Log: What has been -traceTreeWalker in ANTLR 2.7.0 has become -traceTreeParser in 2.7.2 PR: 20020 Revision ChangesPath 1.27 +25 -4 ant/src/main/org/apache/tool

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20020] - ANTLR.java invalid command-line argument: -traceTreeWalker;

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18715] - [PATCH] to specify basedir to

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Ant status report (for board)

2003-05-21 Thread Dominique Devienne
And the piece which I consider the most debatable from this report... Thankfully Peter Reilly seems to be a persistent person, more than myself for sure, as the resistance to improvements to Ant so desperately necessary for people like me who extend Ant so much, should not face so much resistance

Re: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
- Original Message - From: "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 1:54 PM Subject: Re: antlib > On Wed, 21 May 2003 08:31 pm, Jose Alberto Fernandez wrote: > > > > Well I have to say you are mistaken, in my proposa

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread Costin Manolache
Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary >> URIs for ant type definitions? >> I do not think this is a good idea. > > I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their

RE: antlib

2003-05-21 Thread Jose Alberto Fernandez
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Well I am glad to hear I am wrong. Until 7 days ago, the code > in your proposal > was this (Project.java) > > public Object createInRole(Object container, String type) { > Class clz = container.getClass(); > String rol

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20085] - If a propert is unset, property substitution does nothing

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20119] New: - stcheckout - CStDBException Data too long for field

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20119] - stcheckout - CStDBException Data too long for field

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 21 May 2003, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their > URI themselves. Could anybody please explain why OK, let me try to summarize your answers: Peter says - letting the user chose the URI may create problems if we want t

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20103] - FileSet horrible performance when dir has huge number of subdirs

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20103] - FileSet horrible performance when dir has huge number of subdirs

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20103] - FileSet horrible performance when dir has huge number of subdirs

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20128] New: - vssget command label problem

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: antlib / proposal of Peter Reilly

2003-05-21 Thread J.Pietschmann
Costin Manolache wrote: That's consistent with most of the current uses of XML namespaces - you don't see users picking their favorite XHTML or XSLT namespace URI. To elaborate on this: the original intention of namespaces was to provide universal names for elements. This means http://www.w3.org/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 20103] - FileSet horrible performance when dir has huge number of subdirs

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Adding support for XMLCatalog in EjbJar

2003-05-21 Thread Kyle Adams
I've taken a first stab at adding support for nested elements within , but I'm running into some problems I thought I'd run by the list. First glance, it appeared pretty easy. Add a few methods and insert the following bit of code in the execute method: if (xmlCatalog != null) { saxParser.g

Enhance chgrp/chown? (was: Re: cvs commit: ant/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs Chmod.java ExecuteOn.java)

2003-05-21 Thread Gus Heck
Stefan Bodewig wrote: currently chmod has a fair number of additional features. Which are? dir, includes, excludes, defaultexcludes... chmod supports these with it's own internal fileset. I could duplicate it into my AbstractAccessTask (I think) to produce a similar effect in my tasks, but I ha

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 18715] - [PATCH] to specify basedir to

2003-05-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu