On Mon, 19 May 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) are build script authors allowed to specify arbitary > URIs for ant type definitions? > I do not think this is a good idea.
I've seen that Costin and Conor prefer that antlibs specify their URI themselves. Could anybody please explain why - and at the same time please also explain why user choice would be bad here? I feel I must be missing something. > 2) what should ant do with URIs that it does not recognize? > > a) use current method - unknown elements > b) ignore them > c) explicty say that the ns uri is not supported > d) convert them to Text in task/typedefs (the suggestion below) I'm on the fence between a) and b) and wouldn't like either c or d too much. Stefan