You can use git submodules similarly. I just don't think it stays
automatically up to date with the HEAD of a branch. If you want that, I
believe you need to use a 3rd party plugin.
On 29 April 2014 10:10, Jean-Louis Boudart wrote:
> Then this could be an issue with while migrating to git for Iv
Then this could be an issue with while migrating to git for Ivy / EasyAnt
as they both use xooki to create website and project documentation (website
contains version of each releassed documentation through svn:external).
I thought gitpubsub could be used for website.
2014-04-29 5:00 GMT+02:00 A
It's good to use a separate git repository (or svn repository or whatever
works best for you) for storing large assets. You can use it as a git
submodule to pull in a specific revision ID (so it's somewhat similar to
svn:external, except you have to update it yourself and commit changes to
the poin
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 12:15 PM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
>> Just for info, what makes you say that? Why would git be worse than
>> SVN for large files?
>
> Below see some references found in google, the first one says that each
> vers
Hello Dominique,
On Apr 29, 2014, at 3:32 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
>> git is not the tool of choice to deal with large files such as the ones on
>> dist.apache.org.
>> That might be part of the reason why infra supports only
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Dominique Devienne
wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert
wrote:
>> On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the
only supported mechanism to maintain
On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>>> The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the
>>> only supported mechanism to maintain web sites AFAIK.
>> [...] git/gitpubsub is working?
>
> Apache
Hello Jan,
On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) wrote:
>
>
>
>> The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the
>> only supported mechanism to maintain web sites AFAIK.
>
> I havent looked at the current svnpubsub, but there is also one with that
> name for g
