On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Antoine Levy Lambert <anto...@gmx.de> wrote: > On Apr 28, 2014, at 1:29 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm) <apa...@materne.de> wrote: >>> The web sites will remain in svn in any event because svnpubsub is the >>> only supported mechanism to maintain web sites AFAIK. >> [...] git/gitpubsub is working? > > Apache Infra does not support gitpubsub for [...] web site.
> git is not the tool of choice to deal with large files such as the ones on > dist.apache.org. > That might be part of the reason why infra supports only svn for the web site. Just for info, what makes you say that? Why would git be worse than SVN for large files? Is that because all clones must "copy" all versions (compressed deltas I guess) of those large files? --DD --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@ant.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@ant.apache.org
