Hi all,
Having just got back from hols and getting up to speed on this, my
initial thoughts are -1 for including this in 1.7.0, given that we are
in the release candidate stage and Antoine wants to do the full
release in 9 days.
I know it's bad form to veto when I may not be 100% sure of all the
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would like to propose to have an initial implemenation
> with language="javascript" just using the bsf engine.
> and "jsr:javascript" to denote the javax.script.
>
> This will I think allow use of javax.scripting without
> having a
On 11/29/06, Steve Loughran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jesse Glick wrote:
> Peter Reilly wrote:
>> If the attribute is not specified a default path will be used - all
>> the scriptapi's that ant known about. - bsf, jsr.
>
> So why add the API attribute at all? Just do the right thing without
> ha
Jesse Glick wrote:
Peter Reilly wrote:
If the attribute is not specified a default path will be used - all
the scriptapi's that ant known about. - bsf, jsr.
So why add the API attribute at all? Just do the right thing without
having to be told. Legacy scripts will expect to use BSF and they w
Hello Peter, and others
I am thinking of building Ant 1.7.0 on Sunday, December 10. This
would mean a release date for the public of Sunday, December 17.
Would this fit with the work to add this scripting support ?
Concerning the contents of the scripting support, I trust you. :-)
Regards,
Peter Reilly wrote:
If the attribute is not specified a default path will be used - all
the scriptapi's that ant known about. - bsf, jsr.
So why add the API attribute at all? Just do the right thing without
having to be told. Legacy scripts will expect to use BSF and they will
get it. New scr
On 11/28/06, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/27/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As java6 will be released shortly (I think in december)
> it would be nice to allow ant to use javax.scripting
> for a script engine. I would allow oob (out of the box)
> usage of a s
On 11/27/06, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As java6 will be released shortly (I think in december)
it would be nice to allow ant to use javax.scripting
for a script engine. I would allow oob (out of the box)
usage of a scripting language with ant on java6 and
allow scripting with langua
Peter Reilly wrote:
As java6 will be released shortly (I think in december)
it would be nice to allow ant to use javax.scripting
for a script engine. I would allow oob (out of the box)
usage of a scripting language with ant on java6 and
allow scripting with languages that only have javax.scriptin
As java6 will be released shortly (I think in december)
it would be nice to allow ant to use javax.scripting
for a script engine. I would allow oob (out of the box)
usage of a scripting language with ant on java6 and
allow scripting with languages that only have javax.scripting
engines (F3 for exa
10 matches
Mail list logo
