Peter Reilly wrote:
As java6 will be released shortly (I think in december)
it would be nice to allow ant to use javax.scripting
for a script engine. I would allow oob (out of the box)
usage of a scripting language with ant on java6 and
allow scripting with languages that only have javax.scripting
engines (F3 for example - I think).
I had proposed before to use the convention
language="jsr:javascript" to denote the jaxax.scripting
engine, and language="bsf:javascript" to denote the
bsf engine with language="javascript" to denote seaching
for the first implementation.
+1 for having this option and implementing it in 1.7.0, so that all
1.7.0 runtimes support the bsf:javascript syntax
If we stick it in in a 1.7.x release it will only cause confusion and
incompatibilities of build files.
I would like to propose to have an initial implemenation
with language="javascript" just using the bsf engine.
and "jsr:javascript" to denote the javax.script.
+1 to having all existing bsf stuff supported under bsf:
0 towards javax.scripting support in 1.7.0
This will I think allow use of javax.scripting without
having a negative impact on the current scripting code.
The changes are very small the the current scripting classes.
three new classes are added:
ScriptRunnerCreator: a class to create a scriptRunner based on
the lanuage and reflection.
JsrScriptRunner : an extension of ScriptRunnerBase that
uses javax.scripting.* via reflection
Reflector : a helper class for reflection.
Peter
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
