OT: META-INF/services - was Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Koberg
OK, sounds good. And apologies for this OT response, but what do you guys think of using this? I just found out about it and really like it, but have only read a few articles. Any pros or cons? Perhaps it is a nice, clean way for Ant to go? best, -Rob On Wed, 2008-02-27 at 15:15 +, Peter Re

Re: bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks, this has already been noticed and a fix will be in ant 1.7.1. In the meantime, the nested element should not be used. Peter On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 3:12 PM, Robert Koberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It > produce

bug: jar task with nested service does not create META-INF/services

2008-02-27 Thread Robert Koberg
Hi, I am trying to use the nested service element in the jar class. It produces a META-INF/service rather than META-INF/services: /** * Write SPI Information to JAR */ private void writeServices(ZipOutputStream zOut) throws IOException { Iterator serviceIterator;

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2008-02-12 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

jar-task

2007-10-06 Thread e-v-e-wg
task java, so here is my question: how can i set systemproperties in a jar- task. is it possible to set them in the manifest??? i want just the vm not to use the default java.util.logging.config.file. i have my own and want the vm to know it when i start java -jar ! I would be very happy if som

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2007-08-03 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42632] - Jar task may not close all input streams?

2007-06-30 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42632] - Jar task may not close all input streams?

2007-06-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42632] New: - Jar task may not close all input streams?

2007-06-11 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42632 Summary: Jar task may not close all input streams? Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2007-05-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 42527] New: - the nested service element of jar task

2007-05-27 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42527 Summary: the nested service element of jar task Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows Server 2003 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

2007-04-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2007-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41879] - Jar Task puts service providers into META-INF/service insted of META-INF/services

2007-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41879] New: - Jar Task puts service providers into META-INF/service insted of META-INF/services

2007-03-17 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41879 Summary: Jar Task puts service providers into META-INF/service insted of META-INF/services Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2006-12-25 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2006-12-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2006-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2006-12-18 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 41201] New: - [jar-task] wrong name for services folder

2006-12-18 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41201 Summary: [jar-task] wrong name for services folder Product: Ant Version: 1.7.0RC1 Platform: All OS/Version: Mac OS X 10.4 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2006-09-27 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33026] - jar task fails when zipgroupfileset contains zip files without manifest

2006-09-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33026 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|NPE in jar task when |jar task fails when |zipgroupfileset co

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 17895] - Smarter jar task

2006-07-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37237] - JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task

2006-01-28 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37841] - nested metainfo in jar task not work

2005-12-08 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37841] New: - nested metainfo in jar task not work

2005-12-08 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37841 Summary: nested metainfo in jar task not work Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P1 Component: Core AssignedT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31530] - jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified

2005-11-24 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37609] - jar Task always creates manifest-only jars when no files are matched

2005-11-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37609] - jar Task always creates manifest-only jars when no files are matched

2005-11-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37609] New: - jar Task always creates manifest-only jars when no files are matched

2005-11-23 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37609 Summary: jar Task always creates manifest-only jars when no files are matched Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: All OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37237] - JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37237] - JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task

2005-11-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37259] - whenempty option for jar task should be smarter

2005-10-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37259 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-10-26 21:01 --- ant 1.7 has a new option for the jar task: whenmanifestonlybehavior when no files match. Valid values are "fail", "skip", and "create". Default is "crea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37259] - whenempty option for jar task should be smarter

2005-10-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37259] New: - whenempty option for jar task should be smarter

2005-10-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37259 Summary: whenempty option for jar task should be smarter Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: PC OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: Build P

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37237] New: - JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task

2005-10-24 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37237 Summary: JAR_MARKER added in 1.6.3 breaks indexjar element in jar task Product: Ant Version: 1.6.3 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36865] - jar task : building a Class-Path

2005-09-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36865] - jar task : building a Class-Path

2005-09-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36865] New: - jar task : building a Class-Path

2005-09-29 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36865 Summary: jar task : building a Class-Path Product: Ant Version: 1.6.5 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core tasks AssignedT

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-22 Thread bugzilla
x27; package directory and issue the command like this jar cvf datam.jar com/ does this 'jar' uses a different Java API from ANT task? Javac compiles classes files and creates long file path. It is the ANT jar task that is not able to include those class files in the jar

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-22 17:20 --- Winzip creates the jar correctly. But ANT jar task cannot. I wonder what is the difference. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are rec

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-21 17:35 --- Compilation in not a problem. The class file is being written. But the jar task is not able to include the file in the jar. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.c

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-21 Thread bugzilla
a zip from the directory above the package directory. I tried specifying the basedir for jar task, but still no use. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are wa

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-20 Thread bugzilla
le is not being listed by the jar task when it says adding file ... -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watch

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34079 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-19 00:27 --- Here is the jar task we use -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34079] New: - Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes.

2005-03-19 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34079 Summary: Jar task does not include deeply nested inner classes. Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: other Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33404] - Jar task supporting "replace token" using filterset

2005-02-07 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33404] New: - Jar task supporting "replace token" using filterset

2005-02-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33404 Summary: Jar task supporting "replace token" using filterset Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows 2000 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - insufficient emphasis placed on duplicate attribute of zip & co. WAS Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2005-01-11 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33026] New: - NPE in jar task when zipgroupfileset contains maleformed jar file

2005-01-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33026 Summary: NPE in jar task when zipgroupfileset contains maleformed jar file Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priori

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32482] - jar task doesn't exclude files specified in excludes or excludesfile attributes

2004-12-21 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32639] - Jar task doesn't report missing file in fixed fileset

2004-12-10 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32639] New: - Jar task doesn't report missing file in fixed fileset

2004-12-10 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32639 Summary: Jar task doesn't report missing file in fixed fileset Product: Ant Version: 1.6.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32482] New: - jar task doesn't exclude files specified in excludes or excludesfile attributes

2004-12-01 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32482 Summary: jar task doesn't exclude files specified in excludes or excludesfile attributes Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Sever

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - insufficient emphasis placed on duplicate attribute of zip & co. WAS Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-23 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - insufficient emphasis placed on duplicate attribute of zip & co. WAS Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - insufficient emphasis placed on duplicate attribute of zip & co. WAS Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
tation Resolution|INVALID | Summary|Jar task can create |insufficient emphasis placed |mysteriously broken jar |on duplicate attribute of |files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 |zip & co. WAS Ja

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-15 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-12 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-12 09:30 --- Yes, its backwards compatibility. Earlier versions of the tasks offered no control and allowed multiple copies, so we had to m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-05 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 21:07 --- Often the answer to this type of question is backwards-compati

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-05 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-11-05 20:02 --- So, why is the default behavior to accept duplicate copies of a file into the jar file, given that this can cause unpredi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-11-05 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Stat

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-10-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 20:03 --- Oh, then this is probably INVALID, then? Or at best, a documentation issue? It's quite surprising to have Ant produce a ja

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-10-28 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-28 08:21 --- The logic is there and controlled by the duplicate attribute of the task. It's default value makes Ant add all instances o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-10-27 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-27 03:52 --- Ah.. very good catch! Yes, that seems to fix things quite nicely. Perhaps Ant could use some logic to detect files being

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-10-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-26 15:46 --- Your first example jat contains two duplicate files, arlut/csd/JDataComponent/calendar_dn.gif and arlut/csd/JCalendar/up.gif.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31530] - jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified

2004-10-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31530 jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|Normal |Enhan

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-26 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-25 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-25 12:06 --- After some more digging, I'm not sure my test conditions are actually valid. That is, I believe unjarring a signed jar, the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 16:06 --- Just for future reference, please don't attach someone else's jars to a bug report. It would seem that changing the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 13:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13186) This is a jar file needed for the test case. This file is also available fro

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 13:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13185) One of the jar files needed for the test case. This file is available fr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 13:12 --- Created an attachment (id=13184) This is the sample MANIFEST.MF file used by the ant

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-22 13:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13183) This ant script creates 2 jar files, and reveals an issue with the ja

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-22 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RE

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31833] New: - jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes

2004-10-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31833 jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes Summary: jar task mangles Name: entries in MANIFEST.MF for signed classes Product: Ant Version: 1.6.1 Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 10755] - Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times

2004-10-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10755 Ant 1.5's jar task fails to add new files when run multiple times [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13783] - jar task not updatig

2004-10-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13783 jar task not updatig [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Reso

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13783] - jar task not updatig

2004-10-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13783 jar task not updatig --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-21 14:55 --- How do you justify your statement that "resolved as duplicate" was "obviously incorrect"? -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 13783] - jar task not updatig

2004-10-21 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13783 jar task not updatig [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|DUP

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2004-10-06 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Extending JAR-Task for SPI --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-06 21:52 --- Created an attachment (id=12971) first impl. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addi

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2004-10-05 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Extending JAR-Task for SPI --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-05 10:48 --- Do you really need to use "createService()" instead of "addConfiguredService(Service s)" or any other of the "add..." methods. The main

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2004-10-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Extending JAR-Task for SPI --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 20:46 --- I had al look at the ANT 1.6.2 Sources and tis is my Idea: package org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs; class Service { private String type; private List provid

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31530] New: - jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified

2004-10-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31530 jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified Summary: jar task creates an empty jar file if is specified Product: Ant Version: 1.6.2 Platform: Other OS/Version: Other Statu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2004-10-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Extending JAR-Task for SPI --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-04 09:37 --- We would certainly consider it, especially if you were to provide docs and unit tests alongside the code :) It'd be best if the code was like ; it could also ac

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31520] New: - Extending JAR-Task for SPI

2004-10-04 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31520 Extending JAR-Task for SPI Summary: Extending JAR-Task for SPI Product: Ant Version: unspecified Platform: All URL: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/guide/jar/jar.html#S ervice%20Provider

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14255] - Jar task does not generate INDEX.LST considering entries in MANIFEST's classpath

2004-09-13 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14255 Jar task does not generate INDEX.LST considering entries in MANIFEST's classpath [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30339] - Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2

2004-09-09 Thread bugzilla
gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30339 Jar task can create mysteriously broken jar files in 1.5.1, 1.6.2 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-09-09 22:22 --- Oh, duh. Sorry, I had already tested this problem in 1.6.2, apparently. At this point it still seems that the jar task

  1   2   3   >