Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

ng. > >> Did others have the problem? > > Never, neither on Windows/Cygwin nor on Linux. > > BTW, I thought you were talking about AntUnit's own test suite. To > run Ant's AntUnit tests I simply invoke I initially was. But I fall on the problem with this unit test whi

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

On 2008-11-26, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I still have move-test.xml failing. I tried on windows XP and on > cygwin, with a JDK 1.6 and with 1.5. The antunit test is always > failing. > Did others have the problem? Never, neither on Windows/Cygwin nor on Linux. BTW, I thought

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

as thus thinking to provide this classpath using the >>> project.setCoreLoader. But that didn't worked. >>> Indeed, the coreLoader is not used when declaring antlib. >> >> Is coreLoader used at all? Anywhere? > > > Yes, in a very few tasks : Which ressou

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

2008/11/20 Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 2008-11-19, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I was thus thinking to provide this classpath using the >> project.setCoreLoader. But that didn't worked. >> Indeed, the coreLoader is not used

Re: CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

On 2008-11-19, Gilles Scokart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was thus thinking to provide this classpath using the > project.setCoreLoader. But that didn't worked. > Indeed, the coreLoader is not used when declaring antlib. Is coreLoader used at all? Anywhere? There

CoreLoader not used for antlib & typedef [Re: Launching unit test of antunit]

project are not aware of the classpath used by the unit test. I was thus thinking to provide this classpath using the project.setCoreLoader. But that didn't worked. Indeed, the coreLoader is not used when declaring antlib. The antunit unit tests use 2 aproach to define type : the antlib uri

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] - [Patch] Fix coreloader so that it works

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 16:04 --- It is more similar to the When I introduced that, I said that it is similar to the coreloader stuff, which I could not get to work. The main difference is that the coreloader code does not n

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] - [Patch] Fix coreloader so that it works

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] - [Patch] Fix coreloader so that it works

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Fix coreloader so that it |[Patch] Fix coreloader so

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] - Fix coreloader so that it works

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 14:33 --- Created an attachment (id=18870) --> (http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18870&action=view) patch of changes to fix coreloader -- Configure bugmail: http://issu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] - Fix coreloader so that it works

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 40522] New: - Fix coreloader so that it works

gzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 Summary: Fix coreloader so that it works Product: Ant Version: 1.7Alpha (nightly) Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Core Assi

Re: coreLoader

--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was looking into CoreLoader before. > > According to feedback it was a "failed > experiment". > > see: > > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-

Re: coreLoader

--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I was looking into CoreLoader before. > According to feedback it was a "failed experiment". > see: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=107451990930463&w=2 > Thanks for the info. Perhaps the subproject

Re: coreLoader

I was looking into CoreLoader before. According to feedback it was a "failed experiment". see: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=ant-dev&m=107451990930463&w=2 I had meant to check this and add appropiate deprecated markings but did not get around to it. Peter Matt Benson wrote:

coreLoader

, I tried , which, to my surprise, failed, due to the fact that available doesn't consult the coreLoader of its parent Project when checking the availability of a class or resource. Shouldn't available's code defer to something (in ClasspathUtils perhaps) to m