DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40522 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2006-09-15 16:04 ------- It is more similar to the <addlibpath> When I introduced that, I said that it is similar to the coreloader stuff, which I could not get to work. The main difference is that the coreloader code does not need to modify a classloader. There are a number of things to be done to make it rock solid, (handling of <antcall> <ant> etc, easier handling of ant-<optional> jars etc, modification of <classloader> task to only handle the coreloader and not other classloaders (this is done *much* better by Rainer's http://jtools.org/ant-classloadertask task). the <appendprojectpath> task is a simplified copy of Rainer's task, it only handles the project classpath and assumes that it is URLClassLoader. The latter assumption may not be true if ant is used outside of ant[.bat] (say in a web application). -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
