On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 02:37 am, Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Agreed. Conor runs clover coverage tests every so often, and they are
> interesting.
>
I'll be doing another run soon and filling in the history gaps.
Conor
-
To unsubscri
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
1. Do you use some kind of testing criterion? In other words, is there some
kind of rule
describing what should be tested? Examples of such a criterion could be:
"every line of code should be executed during testing" or "every method
should
have at least one test case."
> From: Magiel Bruntink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 21, 2003 6:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Testing of Ant
>
>
> Dear Ant developers,
>
> I am currently working on a paper regarding the evaluation of
> software testability.
> To va
1. Do you use some kind of testing criterion? In other words, is there some
kind of rule
describing what should be tested? Examples of such a criterion could be:
"every line of code should be executed during testing" or "every method
should
have at least one test case." Often such a criterion is re
Also the unit tests are run each night using gump, this
also tests if other projects using ant can still be build.
http://jakarta.apache.org/gump/
There is also a large user base that is not shy in
reporting issues.
Peter
On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 12:46, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2003,
On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Magiel Bruntink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> To validate theoretical results, I have used the Ant sources as the
> subject of a case study.
Then you already have our main point of testing, our unit tests (in
the src/testcases subdirectory).
> 1. Do you use some kind of testi
Dear Ant developers,
I am currently working on a paper regarding the evaluation of software
testability.
To validate theoretical results, I have used the Ant sources as the subject of
a case study.
I would like to ask you to answer two questions about the way Ant is tested.
Your answers will hel
