On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Magiel Bruntink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To validate theoretical results, I have used the Ant sources as the > subject of a case study.
Then you already have our main point of testing, our unit tests (in the src/testcases subdirectory). > 1. Do you use some kind of testing criterion? As much as possible 8-) There are no hard rules. When a bug is discovered we prefer to have a unit test that verifies the bug. This one will become part of our testsuite and ensure that we won't create the same bug again. But writing tests is no requirement. > 2. Is the level of compliance to the testing criterion subject to > measurement? As there are no rules, there is nothing to validate. > Do you use a tool to automatically calculate your code coverage? Not methodically as part if Ant itself. Conor MacNeill has done so[1][2] over time using Clover, Stephane Bailliez used to do so with JProbe coverage IIRC (sorry, no URL). Stefan Footnotes: [1] http://codefeed.com/blog/archives/000004.html [2] http://codefeed.com/blog/archives/000020.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
