On 2011-03-02, Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
> On top of that I tried to make sense of the error message of
> replacetokens-test.xml (below) but I do not get it ...
> Regards,
> Antoine
> au:antunit] Build File:
> /srv/gump/public/workspace/ant/src/tests/antunit/filters/replacetokens-test.xml
>
On Mon, 7 Apr 2008, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks
Well, I broke at least three tests when I "fixed" the licenses and
didn't notice (because I never built the jspc tasks on my machine and
thought the TraxLiaisonTest were broken for envirnmental reasons on
it).
Stefan
-
Thanks
Peter
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:29 AM, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> for those who haven't noticed: Since I disabled execution of the
> FailureRecorder test when running JUnit4 test-ant now passes in Gump.
> This means every nag mail generated for test-ant hin
On 10/3/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hadn't seen any mail, so...
Yep, unusually quiet ;-) --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 17 Sep 2006, Antoine Levy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - change the unit tests which do not clean behind themselves,
+1
> - may be do something in the "distribution" target to remove
> everything under "src" which svn status displays with a question
> mark.
Sounds OK.
Stefan
-
One more test, again with my apologies...
--- Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry for the spam, testing why I'm not receiving
> list messages...
>
>
>
> __
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
> http://pr
I tested last fridays head against cygwin last night on my
win machine.
I saw the JarTest and the JDepend failures but not the
AntLikeTasksAtTopLevelTest failure.
I looked into the JDepend error - it also happens in raw windows mode.
The problem
is strange - the encoding of the string got from
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Antoine Lévy-Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hopefully the failures are more due to cygwin or to
> misconfigurations rather than anything else.
Can you run them under "plain Windows" using ant.bat and all that?
I don't get any failures running the tests on Linux.
Stefan
On my computer I get another failure:
Testcase: testAntlibResource(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.AntlibTest):
Caused an ERROR
Could not create task or type of type: mytask2.
- Alexey.
Antoine Lévy-Lambert wrote:
While working on an improvement for regular expressions, I run the ant
testcases agai
On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 13:19, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 08 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 09:37, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
> >> So if we agreed that it is OK to add/remove tasks to the target
> >> currently being executed, we simply needed to provide a be
On 08 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 09:37, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> So if we agreed that it is OK to add/remove tasks to the target
>> currently being executed, we simply needed to provide a better
>> implemenntation than the old one. 8-)
> It would be
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 06:00 pm, peter reilly wrote:
>
> It would be difficult to provide a different implementation.
>
Wouldn't cloning the list before iteration do that. It would make the changes
ineffective but not terminal. Not sure if it worth the effort to prevent this
scenario.
> A thing to
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 09:37, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 07 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I am not sure that that depending on an undocumented (I think)
> > feature of Vector/Enumeration is a good idea.
>
> I agree, though it is sort-of documented in Vector's javadocs (th
On 07 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure that that depending on an undocumented (I think)
> feature of Vector/Enumeration is a good idea.
I agree, though it is sort-of documented in Vector's javadocs (the
class description).
,
| The Iterators returned by Vecto
I think in general it is not a good idea.
The code in question is:
in Target#execute
Iterator it = children.iterator();
Object o = it.next();
if (o instanceof Task) {
Task task = (Task) o;
task.perform();
On 04 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The test code in question was inserting tasks
> into the current target, and this does not
> seem to be a good idea.
In general or just after the code change?
If we agree that adding tasks to the current target is no good idea in
general
I think this is due to a change of using
an iterator instead of a enumerator.
The test code in question was inserting tasks
into the current target, and this does not
seem to be a good idea.
I moved the place where the task is being placed
to another target and the test passes.
Peter
Conor wrote
Antoine Levy-Lambert wrote:
Under
- Solaris 2.8
- java version "1.4.0-beta2"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.0-beta2-b77)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.0-beta2-b77, mixed mode)
2 test suites dealing with regular expressions are also failing.
- Original Mess
Hi,
Your guess is nearly right, I originally used beanshell,
after modifying it to use apache BSF. When submitting
I modified the tests to use javascript, but missed the
test to check if script is available.
Cheers,
Peter
On Tuesday 15 April 2003 07:39, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> In addition, test
On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Jan Materne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I think this is a common problem.
Yes and no. Part of it is a manifestation of bug 18476, but that
wouldn't explain why a non-linefeed, non-cariage-return character gets
removed on Unix.
> 1. provide an input file --> platform de
20 matches
Mail list logo
