On 07 Jul 2003, peter reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not sure that that depending on an undocumented (I think) > feature of Vector/Enumeration is a good idea.
I agree, though it is sort-of documented in Vector's javadocs (the class description). ,---- | The Iterators returned by Vector's iterator and listIterator methods | are fail-fast: if the Vector is structurally modified at any time | after the Iterator is created, in any way except through the | Iterator's own remove or add methods, the Iterator will throw a | ConcurrentModificationException. Thus, in the face of concurrent | modification, the Iterator fails quickly and cleanly, rather than | risking arbitrary, non-deterministic behavior at an undetermined time | in the future. The Enumerations returned by Vector's elements method | are not fail-fast. `---- So if we agreed that it is OK to add/remove tasks to the target currently being executed, we simply needed to provide a better implemenntation than the old one. 8-) I tend to agree that we shouldn't allow that use-case, which leaves us at the point that we need to document it. Doing it in the javadocs of Target is one place, <script>'s documentation and the developer section of the manual as well - any other places? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
