Matt Benson wrote:
Anyone from ant-contrib want to add a caveat to the
documentation of the for task? Being based on
macrodefs, for is the only place I know of where this
comes into play:
Same applies to macros in macros!
since the @ character is escaped
with another (@@) in macrodefs/for, neste
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone from ant-contrib want to add a caveat to the
> documentation of the for task?
I'd like to volunteer Peter for this ;-)
> Being based on macrodefs, for is the only place I know of where this
> comes into play: since the @ charac
