On Fri, 18 Feb 2005, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone from ant-contrib want to add a caveat to the > documentation of the for task?
I'd like to volunteer Peter for this ;-) > Being based on macrodefs, for is the only place I know of where this > comes into play: since the @ character is escaped with another (@@) > in macrodefs/for, nested for loops must double-escape the @ > character (@@@@). Cool. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
