On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sent on Monday. Any good Stefan?
Sorry for the lack of response. I've seen it but haven't had the time
to look at it yet, sorry.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [E
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 25 September 2003 09:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: JUnit task - forking only once for a batch
>
>
> On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. Is there planned support for this already?
Not exactly for forking each . What has been asked for
(but never implemented) is forking exactly one VM for all tests.
> 2. If not, who maintains the JUnit task,
All Ant co
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, Philip Aston wrote:
> I finally got fed up with the cost of forking a new process for every test
> (~1 second in my environment). I've hacked to support a new type
> of where where all of the tests are executed in a single
> sub-process. *Much* faster.
>
> I'm quite willing
