Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The implementation does however involve a small Backward
Incompatible change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd say we can live with that.
Cool,
Should it also go into the infamous ant 1.6.2 ?
(Al
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The implementation does however involve a small Backward
> Incompatible change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd say we can live with that.
In a response to DD you say that you can't mix an implicit element
with explicit el
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 10:20 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Implicit element for macrodef
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking into an implementation of implicit nested elements for
macrodef:
Cool.
The
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am looking into an implementation of implicit nested elements for
macrodef:
Cool.
The implementation does however involve a small Backward Incompatible
change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
5, 2004 10:20 AM
To: 'Ant Developers List'
Subject: RE: Implicit element for macrodef
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am looking into an implementation of implicit nested elements for
> macrodef:
Cool.
>
>
>
>
>
&g
> From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I am looking into an implementation of implicit nested elements for
> macrodef:
Cool.
>
>
>
>
>
> The implementation does however involve a small Backward Incompatible
> change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd sa
