On Tue, 25 May 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The implementation does however involve a small Backward > Incompatible change to the implementation of MacroInstance.
I'd say we can live with that. In a response to DD you say that you can't mix an implicit element with explicit elements. Is this really required? Can't we have an implicit catch-all element for the nested elements that don't match any explicitly stated nested elements? Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
