Hi
Well fair enough, it is recognizable as the exit value will in that case
be Integer.MAX_VALUE, so that should not be an issue. (So far for the
non-hardcoded values)
Thanks, Martijn
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
regarding option 1 would
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> regarding option 1 wouldn't this still need a patch to set
> killedProcess() to true
Hmm, only if it has been the watchdog that has killed the process
IMHO. If the InterruptedException has been raised for any other
reason, we sho
Hi,
actually your new solution was my first approach which I left because of
this documentation,
regarding option 1
wouldn't this still need a patch to set killedProcess() to true (i know
horrible way to say what I mean, but this should be clear) when destroy
is called via the InterruptedExcepti
