On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Martijn Kruithof <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > regarding option 1 wouldn't this still need a patch to set > killedProcess() to true
Hmm, only if it has been the watchdog that has killed the process IMHO. If the InterruptedException has been raised for any other reason, we shouldn't claim that a timeout has been hit. This is no strong opinion, though. If it's been because of the watchdog, the current implementation should work fine. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
