Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/25/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/25/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > I propose that we defer handing id's until the

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I feel uncomfortable about changing this, even though you are >> probably right that it it should better be changed. > > Is this the -0 I feel I read, or a stronger -1 Stefan? a -0, I'm more vocal with a -1 ;-) Stefan

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
I feel uncomfortable about changing this, even though you are probably right that it it should better be changed. Is this the -0 I feel I read, or a stronger -1 Stefan? --DD - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For addit

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/25/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> > I propose that we defer handing id's until the processing >> > stage. >> >> Will probably break somethi

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Dominique Devienne
I really cannot see the use-case described by the example. I would not think that there are any examples in the "wild". Oh, I'm sure there are! Yet I support your proposed change Peter. I also consider this usage of id an anti-pattern, and I'm fine to breaking BC in this case to fix once and for

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-25 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/25/06, Stefan Bodewig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we defer handing id's until the processing > stage. Will probably break something like

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-24 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Fri, 22 Sep 2006, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I propose that we defer handing id's until the processing > stage. Will probably break something like

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-22 Thread Antoine Levy-Lambert
+1 for this change, Antoine - Original Message - From: "Peter Reilly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ant Developers List" Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:00 PM Subject: Deferring references > Currently in ant, there is two steps in processing > a project build file, a parsing step and an

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 9/22/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > [SNIP] > > > I propose that we defer handing id's until the > > > processing > > > stage. > > > > > > The change to do this is very small. >

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-22 Thread Peter Reilly
On 9/22/06, Matt Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > I propose that we defer handing id's until the > processing > stage. > > The change to do this is very small. > [SNIP] > I have have played a little with this and everthing > seems > to work f

Re: Deferring references

2006-09-22 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [SNIP] > I propose that we defer handing id's until the > processing > stage. > > The change to do this is very small. > [SNIP] > I have have played a little with this and everthing > seems > to work fine. > I would imagine we couldn't call this change