Re: Authors tag

2004-03-11 Thread Costin Manolache
Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. I suppose it's too late for a -1 on removing the @author tags based on the board recommendation... Well, all I can

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-11 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks, googleing for "slo" was not too successful... Peter Steve Loughran wrote: Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-11 Thread Peter Reilly
Thanks, Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: gg at grtmail dot com Gautam Guliani (used to be in Get.java before you removed it 8-) miha at softhome dot net Couldn't find anything but Miha. Mail him/her? skanthak at muehlheim d

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-10 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 09 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > gg at grtmail dot com Gautam Guliani (used to be in Get.java before you removed it 8-) > miha at softhome dot net Couldn't find anything but Miha. Mail him/her? > skanthak at muehlheim dot de Sebastian Kanthak

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-09 Thread Steve Loughran
Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: slo that is me. Its my unix/nt login ID and what intellij wou

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-09 Thread Peter Reilly
my bugzilla login... riznob at hotmail dot com. -Rob A -Original Message- From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:40 AM To: Ant Developers List Subject: Re: Authors tag I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top

RE: Authors tag

2004-03-09 Thread Anderson, Rob (Global Trade)
age- > From: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2004 9:40 AM > To: Ant Developers List > Subject: Re: Authors tag > > > I have commited the removal of authors patch. > I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the > authors names

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-09 Thread Martijn Kruithof
Peter Reilly wrote: I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: gg at grtmail dot com miha at softhome dot net rhanderson skant

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-09 Thread Peter Reilly
I have commited the removal of authors patch. I made a CONTRIBUTORS file at the top level containing the authors names - without corresponding e-mail addresses. The following name/e-mails I could not find names for: gg at grtmail dot com miha at softhome dot net rhanderson skanthak at muehlheim dot

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-04 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Wed, 03 Mar 2004, Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I feel like a vandal, but should we do this now? +1 > using > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177 > for the list of commiters I haven't checked that list myself, but I'll assume it is rather complete. We may wan

Re: Authors tag

2004-03-03 Thread Peter Reilly
I feel like a vandal, but should we do this now? using http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27177 for the list of commiters Peter Stefan Bodewig wrote: On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant pro

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-26 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant > project. We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions > appropriately. The board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference > would be to create a CONTRIBUTORS fi

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Steve Loughran
Jack J. Woehr wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" When's the IPO? What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. It's alre

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread martijn
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004, Conor MacNeill wrote: > We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant project. > We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions appropriately. The > board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a > CONTRIBUTORS file listing names

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Peter Reilly
Conor MacNeill wrote: We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the Ant project. We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions appropriately. The board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a CONTRIBUTORS file listing names only, due to worms and spam (

RE: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Jan . Materne
> We need to decide how we handle the author tags issue in the > Ant project. > We need a mechanism to credit people's contributions > appropriately. The > board suggests a CHANGES file. My preference would be to create a > CONTRIBUTORS file listing names only, due to worms and spam (an > int

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Conor MacNeill
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 00:25:25 -0700, Jack J. Woehr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > When's the IPO? What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you

RE: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Jan . Materne
> > What means IPO? > > Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a > public corporation. > I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. > It's already got Theo de Raadt swearing he's going to pull Apache > out of the OpenBSD source tree. Thanks, Jack.

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Jack J. Woehr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > > When's the IPO? > > What means IPO? Initial Public Offering when a private entity becomes a public corporation. I was teasing you all about the increasing legalism pervading Apache. It's already go

RE: Authors tag

2004-02-24 Thread Jan . Materne
> > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these create > difficulties in > > establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our > > committers. there are other social issues dealing with > collaborative

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-23 Thread Jack J. Woehr
Peter Reilly wrote: > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these create difficulties in > establishing the proper ownership and the protection of our > committers. there are other social issues dealing with collabora

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-23 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Matt Benson wrote: > > >> - author tags are officially discouraged. these > >> > >I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle > >config to allow only whitespace as the @author > >parameter as a relatively safe starting point, > > > I have

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-23 Thread Peter Reilly
Matt Benson wrote: --- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February 18, 2004" - author tags are officially discouraged. these I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle config to allow only whitespace as the @author parameter as a re

Re: Authors tag

2004-02-23 Thread Matt Benson
--- Peter Reilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just noticed this in "ASF Board Summary for February > 18, 2004" > > - author tags are officially discouraged. these I noticed this too. Could we change the checkstyle config to allow only whitespace as the @author parameter as a relatively safe st