Re: Apt Task

2005-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Steve Loughran wrote: But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'm not offering to write it though; enough on my todo list. I will write it next time I need it. :-) . Las

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-07 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Steve Loughran wrote: But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'm not offering to write it though; enough on my todo list. I will write it next time I need it. :-) . Last time I just executed java

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: Is there with ? not yet. it was always avoided as we'd rather people do tasks with proper configuration, dependency and reuse. But it would be nice for a java-apply, and perhaps a script-apply too. something that bulk executed a bit of inline script against files. I'

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Jess Holle wrote: I can *run* it now but: 1. It is unclear if I can upgrade NetBean's Ant to 1.7. Some IDEs support switching; dunno about netbeans. 2. We ship Ant and it has to be a non-beta -- and it is much less confusing to stick to just one version for all purposes. pull down the 1.7

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
Is there with ? - Alexey. Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this *now*. In the mean time, w

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Jess Holle
Thanks. That did help. -- Jess Holle Dominique Devienne wrote: From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this *now*. In the m

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Jess Holle
I can *run* it now but: 1. It is unclear if I can upgrade NetBean's Ant to 1.7. 2. We ship Ant and it has to be a non-beta -- and it is much less confusing to stick to just one version for all purposes. Alexey N. Solofnenko wrote: If 1.7 ANT is better, run it now. We are running 1.7 withou

RE: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Dominique Devienne
> From: Jess Holle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) > task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? > > I could really use this *now*. In the mean time, why don't you use: ... . is a powerful task, more

Re: Apt Task

2005-03-04 Thread Alexey N. Solofnenko
If 1.7 ANT is better, run it now. We are running 1.7 without any problems. - Alexey. Jess Holle wrote: Any hopes of a general purpose 'apt' (Java 5 annotation processor tool) task akin to 'javac', e.g. as an contrib-like add-on for Ant 1.6.x? I could really use this *now*. -- Jess Holle -

Re: APT Task

2004-08-06 Thread Steve Loughran
Inger, Matthew wrote: I submitted an APT task a while back that will run the JDK 5.0 APT tool. I was wondering what the state of that submission was. I've seen no update to the bugzilla record in quite some time: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29978 I would think that as JDK 5.0