> From: Martijn Kruithof [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I also like core best, but maybe it isn't such a good idea indeed.
Let's just forget about org.apache.ant.core... --DD
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
rto Fernandez wrote:
We could use org.apache.ant.kernel :-)
Isn't it the same thing?
JA
-Original Message-
From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
To: Ant Developers List
Subject: RE: Antlib package names
From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailt
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
somewhere in the package n
> From: Phil Weighill-Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Use of "core" as a package/directory name is mildly off
in
> a UNIX environment as the directory might be confused with a core
dump!
> ;n)
>
> Phil :n)
It would be a directory instead of a file though, so it wouldn't be
mistaken for long.
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package.
> That´s a general question for future extensions.
>
> > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps it could be just "org.apache.ant.svn" - i.e. drop antlibs.
Actually, Peter
rs List
Cc:
Subject: RE: Antlib package names
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package.
> That´s a general question for future extensions.
>
> > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps
We could use org.apache.ant.kernel :-)
Isn't it the same thing?
JA
> -Original Message-
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 20 April 2005 16:24
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: RE: Antlib package names
>
>
> > From: Ph
Dominique Devienne wrote:
From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
"newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
somewhere in the package n
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> for the svn tasks I've used org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.svn, for the
> "newer" antunit I've used org.apache.ant.antlibs.antunit.
>
> I'd like to drop the "tools" for antlibs and I think antlibs should be
> somewhere in the package names, so I
