> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> We shouldnt plan the name only for the svn-package.
> Thatīs a general question for future extensions.
> 
> > Von: Peter Reilly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Perhaps it could be just "org.apache.ant.svn" - i.e. drop antlibs.

Actually, Peter might have a point. Why not drop antlibs,
and to indeed differentiate future extensions from Ant core,
then add an explicit org.apache.ant.core package, which opens
up the app-top-level org.apache.ant package for antlibs.

So we'd have:
org.apache.ant.core     - Ant Core - explicit enough
org.apache.ant.svn      - SNV AntLib
org.apache.ant.foo      - FOO AntLib
org.apache.ant.bar      - BAR AntLib
etc...

I think I like this scheme better in fact. Use a more
explicit package for Core, while offering shorter names
for AntLibs. --DD

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to