> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> No, I was talking about our processes in my regular work.
Ah, but we're not asking you to switch to SVN ;-)
Seriously, the merge burden needs to be addressed, and I really
believe SVN is a possible solution (not the solution). --DD
-
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM tool
> > > with better merging abilities, and Subversion co
> From: Jose Alberto Fernandez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM
> > tool with better merging abilities, and Subversion comes to
> > mind of course. From the little I've read, it seems tha
> From: Dominique Devienne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Another more controversial alternative would be to use a CM
> tool with better merging abilities, and Subversion comes to
> mind of course. From the little I've read, it seems that SVN
> does merges better, without the need for tags,
> From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> The choices I see for branch management are:
>
> 1. Keep going the way we are now - i.e. applying changes to both HEAD
> and the active branch.
>
> 2. Keep going as we do now but make sure branches are shorter lived.
The
>impact of this would
Stephen McConnell wrote:
What is the criteria that is use by the Ant project for a major, minor,
and micro version bump?
Stephen.
This is my opinion.
A major version number increment represents a change in internal
architecture. At such a transition some level of backwards compatibility
breakage
What is the criteria that is use by the Ant project for a major, minor,
and micro version bump?
Stephen.
> -Original Message-
> From: Antoine Levy-Lambert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23 August 2004 22:02
> To: Ant Developers List
> Subject: Ant 1.6.3 [was status report on the PMC
