Yes, this is what I was looking for !
Thanks,
Benjamin
Le 17/10/2010 19:47, Jeffrey E Care a écrit :
I'm not sure that I completely understand your question, but maybe
is what you're looking for?
J
I'm not sure that I completely understand your question, but maybe
is what you're looking for?
Jeffrey E. (Jeff) Care
ca...@us.ibm.com
IBM WebSphere Application Server
WAS Release Engineering
> From: Stefan Bodewig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > Should be trivial to add a 'resource' attribute, no?
>
> can contain which in turn supports resource. This
> should work right now, shouldn't it?
Indeed it works, as demonstrated below. Cool! Thanks Stefan and Peter ;-)
I'm just starting
Ok,
I have updated ant-contrib's antlib.xml to include
the ant-contribs properties file via a typedef
in the antlib.xml file.
Peter
On Monday 13 October 2003 19:21, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> Thinking about the prospect of having to maintain both
> tasks/types.properties, and the new antlib.xml,
On Tuesday 14 October 2003 07:45, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I like keeping definitions is one place only. Avoids being
> > out-of-sync. The recent commit messages on Ant-Contrib already show
> > this happening for a project looked
On Mon, 13 Oct 2003, Dominique Devienne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like keeping definitions is one place only. Avoids being
> out-of-sync. The recent commit messages on Ant-Contrib already show
> this happening for a project looked at by many pairs of eyes...
But I for one haven't looked into
